Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:42 am
See posts from chopped liver above.deadtorius wrote:perhaps a game designer might want to intervene on this one since it seems entirely dependent on how you interpret the rules as they are written.
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:26 am
So in practical terms "with" means "in the same move as" in that setnence?
BTW, need some chopped liver in the most recent kinky columns thread.
BTW, need some chopped liver in the most recent kinky columns thread.
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:41 am
YesMikeK wrote:So in practical terms "with" means "in the same move as" in that sentence?
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:30 am
Thanks, I'll jot it down on the page (the hardbound volume has endured wear very well!).rbodleyscott wrote:Yes
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:18 pm
I thought i felt a disturbance in the time space fields.rbodleyscott wrote:
OMG I am agreeing with Madcam
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:20 pm
Does this mean that everyone who's been through the Manchester FOG Bootcamp has a similar misunderstanding?I agree with Mr Dalby. Although playing with Hammy I play it Hammy's way as its easier than a discussion most of the time. So we are both cheating each other, and cheaters only cheat themselves. So it cancels out really.
Pete
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:21 pm
I think a bit of confusion could have been fixed by changing the name a simple advance into an ordinary advance. The simple advance and simple move gets people forgetful to look at the clarifying text.
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:55 pm
It would if we had gone into that level of detailpetedalby wrote:Does this mean that everyone who's been through the Manchester FOG Bootcamp has a similar misunderstanding?I agree with Mr Dalby. Although playing with Hammy I play it Hammy's way as its easier than a discussion most of the time. So we are both cheating each other, and cheaters only cheat themselves. So it cancels out really.
Most people were happy enough to be able to get the basics of movement and combat.
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:10 am
But shifts are permitted with turns during an evasion move, as per example on page 166. That's the only case in which shifts, turns and wheel are permitted. Correct?rbodleyscott wrote:They do indeed. That's what I saidhammy wrote:The rules actually say:
Shifts are not permitted when charging, nor in second moves, nor with double wheels, expansions, contractions or turns.
giorgio
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:25 am
CorrectBut shifts are permitted with turns during an evasion move, as per example on page 166. That's the only case in which shifts, turns and wheel are permitted. Correct?
Evade moves are different to voluntary movement.
Pete