Page 702 of 1364
Re: Larger armies right across the FOG2 Digital League?
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 6:37 am
by stockwellpete
nyczar wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 10:53 pm
70% feels high to me. I am thinking that a 70% threshold is designed to minimize the loss of players. If it is desired to minimize player defection, 60% seems like a strong vote to at least add one more division to the 1600 point threshold, if not both. I'll sign up for my 4 divisions regardless.
I think we have a good balance already with 2 sections at 1200pts and 2 at 1600pts. So I don't think there is any need for a change unless there is very substantial support for one. That is why I set the bar at 70%. If those wanting a change fall just short of this target then I will change the Themed Event to 1600pts provided there is at least 66% support for larger 1600pt armies. But to shift me from 1200pts for Classical and Late Antiquity you will need to get 70% in the poll.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 6:58 am
by bomber23
Division D
bomber23 [Andulsians] beat baldrick52 [Indians] 57-22
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:19 am
by herm
Division A
herm (seleucid) beat cunningcairn (thracian) 58-25
Thks to my opponent.
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:52 am
by Garokan
Division D
Garokan – Arab, Bedouin 300-636 AD with Byzantine 579-599 AD allies defeated Barrold713 - Roman 425-492 AD with Frankish 260-495 AD allies 60 - 38
Thanks for the game
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 9:06 am
by bomber23
Division D
bomber23 challenges:
Doyley50
edb1815
ggarynorman
Supervark
password 1234
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 9:33 am
by stockwellpete
- Early Middle Ages A-D Tables.jpg (867.93 KiB) Viewed 1371 times
- Early Middle Ages E-F Tables.jpg (486.32 KiB) Viewed 1371 times
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 11:02 am
by stockwellpete
- Early Middle Ages A-B Charts.jpg (667.21 KiB) Viewed 1308 times
- Early Middle Ages C-D Charts.jpg (655.22 KiB) Viewed 1308 times
- Early Middle Ages E-F charts.jpg (669.05 KiB) Viewed 1308 times
Swuul has won Early Middle Ages Division D!
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 11:05 am
by stockwellpete
With 9 straight wins Swuul and his British army have swept all before him in Early Middle Ages Division D. Well played Swuul!
kraff has won Early Middle Ages Division F!
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 11:07 am
by stockwellpete
With 8 matches completed kraff and his Sassanid army have built an unassailable lead in Early Middle Ages Division F. Well played kraff!
Re: Calling MakeshiftPlan . . .
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 11:10 am
by stockwellpete
There is still no contact from MakeshiftPlan. I will give him to the end of Sunday to make contact as he has completed one match, but I think it very likely that he is AWOL now. Stormcrow is standing by to take his place.
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 11:50 am
by hscic
Division F
hscic - Palmyran 258-273 AD
challenges
gioe07 – Byzantine 493-550 AD
PW is.gioe
PM sent
Re: Swuul has won Early Middle Ages Division D!
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 12:10 pm
by Swuul
Thank you
Re: Swuul has won Early Middle Ages Division D!
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 12:44 pm
by Ludendorf
Congratulations Swuul. That's a fantastic achievement!
Re: Swuul has won Early Middle Ages Division D!
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 12:57 pm
by Nosy_Rat
Impressive result, congratulations!
Re: Swuul has won Early Middle Ages Division D!
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 1:10 pm
by Doyley50
Well done Swuul!
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 1:21 pm
by General Shapur
Division D
General Shapur Dailami 928-1055 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies defeats Doyley50 Anglo-Danish 1017-1041 48:21
thanks for the game
Re: Larger armies right across the FOG2 Digital League?
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 1:44 pm
by nyczar
stockwellpete wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 6:37 am
nyczar wrote: ↑Wed Jun 24, 2020 10:53 pm
70% feels high to me. I am thinking that a 70% threshold is designed to minimize the loss of players. If it is desired to minimize player defection, 60% seems like a strong vote to at least add one more division to the 1600 point threshold, if not both. I'll sign up for my 4 divisions regardless.
I think we have a good balance already with 2 sections at 1200pts and 2 at 1600pts. So I don't think there is any need for a change unless there is very substantial support for one. That is why I set the bar at 70%. If those wanting a change fall just short of this target then I will change the Themed Event to 1600pts provided there is at least 66% support for larger 1600pt armies. But to shift me from 1200pts for Classical and Late Antiquity you will need to get 70% in the poll.
Got it, Thanks.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:21 pm
by SpeedyCM
Division C
SpeedyCM - Dailami 928-1055 AD with Armenian 885-1045 AD allies defeats ulysisgrunt - Viking, Ireland 900-1049 AD with Scots 851-1051 AD allies 40-4.
Re: kraff has won Early Middle Ages Division F!
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 3:35 pm
by Swuul
Grats kraff, well done!
Re: Larger armies right across the FOG2 Digital League?
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 4:05 pm
by Ludendorf
I'd kind of like a mix to be honest. I guess I'll abstain. A 2000 point tournament would be interesting as well; it drastically changes how some of the more one-dimensional lists play. The Galatians go from being a mediocre list to being positively lethal for example.