Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:49 am
Just wanted to point out that all is right with the world and Dave R, as expected, was in 2nd place.hannibal wrote: Total
Points
1 Andy Ellis 78
2 Dave Ruddock 68
3 Richard Jeffrey-Cook 64
Just wanted to point out that all is right with the world and Dave R, as expected, was in 2nd place.hannibal wrote: Total
Points
1 Andy Ellis 78
2 Dave Ruddock 68
3 Richard Jeffrey-Cook 64
Just wanted to point out that all is right with the world and Dave R, as expected, was in 2nd place.
So it was a strategic disaster for you, but you snuck out a gamey tournament win.dave_r wrote:, but losing all four BG's of cataphracts in the process.
Pete this is surely a sign of arthritis and old age, when the young ones are nipping at your heels and about to over take you. No wonder you missed Lisbon, you weren't sure you're rocking chair was available.6 Peter Dalby 51
7 Harrison Pearce 50
And here was me thinking that the Americans would be doing everything possible to try and forget their dismal performance at Lisbon ....hazelbark wrote:Pete this is surely a sign of arthritis and old age, when the young ones are nipping at your heels and about to over take you. No wonder you missed Lisbon, you weren't sure you're rocking chair was available.6 Peter Dalby 51
7 Harrison Pearce 50
Well, I destroyed three legions in the process, rode over some Light Foot and sacked the camp. Dave's army was only 11 BG's, so just need to fragment one more BG, which given that there was only one general left and holes everywhere, wasn't too tricky. I did lose 12AP though - so it wasn't a walkover by any means.hazelbark wrote:So it was a strategic disaster for you, but you snuck out a gamey tournament win.dave_r wrote:, but losing all four BG's of cataphracts in the process.
![]()
Quite right - I'm absolutely past my best and am now on the inevitable slide to mediocrity.Pete this is surely a sign of arthritis and old age, when the young ones are nipping at your heels and about to over take you. No wonder you missed Lisbon, you weren't sure you're rocking chair was available.
Thats what I said I had won a moral victory, but he would'nt have ithazelbark wrote:So it was a strategic disaster for you, but you snuck out a gamey tournament win.dave_r wrote:, but losing all four BG's of cataphracts in the process.
![]()
YOU and your revisionist history. I remember soundly thumping a GB team member who tried all sort of tricky rules lawyering and it helped him not. He resorted to continually evading off the table and used strategems like smoke breaks to avoid defeat.dave_r wrote:And here was me thinking that the Americans would be doing everything possible to try and forget their dismal performance at Lisbon ....
hazelbark wrote:YOU and your revisionist history. I remember soundly thumping a GB team member who tried all sort of tricky rules lawyering and it helped him not. He resorted to continually evading off the table and used strategems like smoke breaks to avoid defeat.dave_r wrote:And here was me thinking that the Americans would be doing everything possible to try and forget their dismal performance at Lisbon ....
Dan didn't even win the game, it was 1-1 in the end, meaning GB bt USA 8-2.nikgaukroger wrote:hazelbark wrote:YOU and your revisionist history. I remember soundly thumping a GB team member who tried all sort of tricky rules lawyering and it helped him not. He resorted to continually evading off the table and used strategems like smoke breaks to avoid defeat.dave_r wrote:And here was me thinking that the Americans would be doing everything possible to try and forget their dismal performance at Lisbon ....
Remind us which team won the team comp that is the ITC.
dave_r wrote:Dan didn't even win the game, it was 1-1 in the end, meaning GB bt USA 8-2.nikgaukroger wrote:hazelbark wrote: YOU and your revisionist history. I remember soundly thumping a GB team member who tried all sort of tricky rules lawyering and it helped him not. He resorted to continually evading off the table and used strategems like smoke breaks to avoid defeat.
Remind us which team won the team comp that is the ITC.
But i'd eight two keep mentioning it
When V2 is published Eric. It will, I think, be a year plus and it won't be scrappy bits of paper but a new rule book. But no new lists, thankfully.ericdoman1 wrote:Heard rumours that there may well be some changes, in particular with ref to moving lf, turning and moving. Where would I find these ammendments.
Why?ericdoman1 wrote:Come on guys give the Americans a break.
We received (i.e. team gb) a lot of flak from team usa last year over our fourth place finish. Only seems fair to return the favour.unless there is a lot of tongue in cheek involved (dave R 8 2 tell you this was very good though LOL)
The smoke breaks were to avoid your constant dismal whining Dan.hazelbark wrote:YOU and your revisionist history. I remember soundly thumping a GB team member who tried all sort of tricky rules lawyering and it helped him not. He resorted to continually evading off the table and used strategems like smoke breaks to avoid defeat.
Drop me an e-mail (mlu120@aol.com) to remind me & I'll send you the spreadsheetRobert241167 wrote:Hi Marc
Just for the record where could I find the full results by team for last year?
Thanks
Rob


