I have ordered a book that I should receive soon (
if there is no problem with what everyone knows 
):
“
L’apport capital de la France dans la victoire des alliés”, written by Dominique Lormier (April 2011)
(So, as title something like: “
France's capital contribution to the victory of the allies”…)
Alas, this book (made by historians!) is only available in French right now…
My translation of the abstract:
“
An indispensable historical clarification.
Sweeping away the clichés conveyed by reductionist and partisan Anglo-American historiography, this work offers a complete and detailed panorama of France's military action during the two world conflicts. Based on the most significant facts, figures, documents and testimonies, it provides proof of the capital contribution of French troops in the Allied victories.
As early as September 1914, with the victory of the Marne, the French army condemned its German rival to war on two fronts. Throughout 1915, French offensives established the majority of German divisions on the western front. At Verdun and on the Somme in 1916, at Malmaison in 1917, the French army achieved significant successes. From March to April 1918, many French divisions twice saved the British army from disaster, in Picardy and Flanders. In July 1918, before the massive arrival of American reinforcements, the French army won the second Battle of the Marne, condemning Germany to a definitive defeat, due to the massive use of French tanks and planes.
The fierce and little-known battles in May-June 1940, particularly by the French air force, the forgotten battles in Africa in 1941-1942, the brilliant campaigns in Tunisia, Italy, France and Germany and 1943-1945 enabled the French troops to distinguish themselves in particular, not forgetting the decisive action of the internal Resistance, particularly in Normandy, Brittany, the South-West and the Alps.”
Some elements which could already interest us (
some for our campaign, some more just for our culture 
):
And my apologies, you'll have to make do with my English translations:
1. The May-June 1940 campaign would have been a walk for the Germans. This lie is an old Vichist antiphon copiously and regularly advanced by a certain Anglo-American historiography. Nothing is falser and more insulting towards the French elders.
- By putting 50% of the 1,559 German aircraft out of action, the French air force and the French DCA seriously obeyed German air capabilities during the Battle of Britain.
- By sacrificing themselves, alone, 1 against 5, the French troops, during 9 days, at Dunkirk, saved the British expeditionary force from capture. "The American historian Walter Lord, an undisputed expert on the Second World War, rightly writes:
'Many German generals consider the Battle of Dunkirk as a turning point in the war: if the British Expeditionary Force had been taken prisoner, Britain would have been defeated; if that had happened, Germany could have concentrated all its forces on Russia; Stalingrad did not take place, etc.'" (p.132 of this book!).
- French troops also destroyed more than half of the German tanks, significantly reducing the German offensive potential.
2. The Free French Forces played a major role in the fight against the Italian troops (as in Koufra) but above all, they valiantly illustrated the French flag at Bir Hakeim in May-June 1942. 3,703 French soldiers resisted on flat ground, offering no natural protection, to 37,000 of the most seasoned German and Italian troops, including the famous panzer divisions, Rommel's pride. "
British General Playfair, the official historian of the Desert War, believes that the 'prolonged defense of the French garrison played a decisive role in the re-establishment of British troops in Egypt. From the outset, the Free French severely disrupted Rommel's offensive. The transport of supplies to the Afrika Korps was severely disrupted. The increasing concentration of Axis forces to pierce this abscess saved the 8th Army from disaster. (...) In the longer term, the slowing of Rommel's maneuver enabled British forces to escape the annihilation foreseen by the Axis. It is by this that it can be said, without exaggeration, that Bir Hakeim facilitated El-Alamein's defensive success." (p.241)
3. After their meetings (FF and "loyalist" French forces) the French Army committed nearly 400,000 men to the theatres of military action in Italy, France and then Germany. In Italy, the supreme commander of the German forces, General Ringel wrote, after the war: "(...)
the man whom even the German command recognized as its most dangerous adversary in Italy: General Juin with his Frenchmen." (p.291)
4. Half of the liberation of the national territory is the exclusive work of the French forces (
FF troops, Lattre de Tassigny's army, Leclerc division). On the specific subject of the Resistance's contribution to the victory of the D-Day landings and the decisive days that followed, the American General Eisenhower, Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Forces, acknowledged the important role played by the Breton Resistance:
"(...)
I believe that the destruction of enemy rail communications, the harassment of German automobile traffic and the increasing pressure exerted by the organised forces of the French Resistance on German troops played a considerable role in our victory" (p.339).
5. "
From the declaration of war in September 1939 to the capitulation of Germany in May 1945, the French army and Resistance units counted 255,200 killed. French military losses in the Second World War were almost as heavy as those of the United States (300,000 soldiers killed) and Great Britain (326,000 soldiers killed). The French army and the fighting forces of the Resistance can claim the disablement of 900,000 Axis soldiers (German or Italian), killed, wounded and prisoners, including 688,000 from 1941 to 1945 and 212,000 in May-June 1940. France's place alongside the three other victorious great powers is therefore not usurped, as the figures themselves bear witness". (p.461-462, always from the same book).
Well, let's make it clear, shall we?
Here it's not about politics or something similar. But there is plenty of room to make this Free France campaign as "big" as one talking about the British or the Americans, if only in terms of the number of scenarios.
I hope to receive this book soon and to find out relevant aspects/info for the future scenarios of this Free France campaign!
For this campaign, there can be a scaling issue… at the beginning it’s question of few battalions only, whereas later it’s about real divisions.
So, now I’m more into something like this:
For the Dakar scenario I’ve written that I suggested something like 1 Heavy Infantry and 2 regular Infantry units to represent the “
13e Demi-brigade de Légion étrangère” (so about one battalion)… but making the three of them core units will overrepresent this unit when it will come to real divisions.
So, I think it would be better to make, let’s say, 1 Heavy Infantry as core and the 2 regular Infantry (all with a corresponding name) only as aux for the few first scenarios where this “Demi-brigade” has been involved.
Like this, later, once fighting at larger scale, this famous unit of the “Légion étrangère” can still appear but only with one single unit – our core (and named!) Heavy.
related to the followings:
