Page 1 of 2

Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 2:51 am
by GabeKnight
While playing, I've noticed some things that may have been changed during the UI overhaul process. I'm doing this from memory, so some "issues" may be none in the end. I try to skip the issues that have been reported elsewhere.

- mouse-wheel speed seems very slow in comparison
- when adjusting the animation speed of the units inside the options, the max. setting is still very slow compared to the previous version. I've "fixed" this by using an old settings\options.dat file, then the animation speed returns to fast again
- the update changed my options/performance/effects quality settings to "low". No biggie, still strange
- you've switched the continue/cancel buttons in the end-turn warnings. If there's no real reason for doing so, please change them back, I've gotten used to it and misclick now...
- I think the font size of the savegame files is way too big, also the scen description below. There's much "unused" space in the box.

Screenshot 117.jpg
Screenshot 117.jpg (950.71 KiB) Viewed 3748 times

- the "box" containing the reserve units could be a bit taller

Screenshot 118.jpg
Screenshot 118.jpg (851.95 KiB) Viewed 3748 times

- maybe my mind's playing tricks on me with this one, but wasn't the heavy inf. mortar icon somewhat bigger/sharper before?

Screenshot 119.jpg
Screenshot 119.jpg (585.22 KiB) Viewed 3748 times

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Mon May 11, 2020 2:38 am
by GabeKnight
Truncated text in the scen description:

Screenshot 122.jpg
Screenshot 122.jpg (182.81 KiB) Viewed 3685 times

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Mon May 11, 2020 2:51 am
by GabeKnight
The white highlight vanishes if I switch to another unit class:

Screenshot 128.jpg
Screenshot 128.jpg (398.64 KiB) Viewed 3684 times

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Mon May 11, 2020 3:00 am
by GabeKnight
The range indicator preview (when hovering mouse over possible move-to hexes) is barely visible:

Screenshot 127.jpg
Screenshot 127.jpg (910.59 KiB) Viewed 3682 times

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Wed May 13, 2020 11:57 am
by bebro
Mousewheel scroll is ok for me now, was specifically mentioned in beta and seems fixed. Are you using old settings? Could be worth backing them up and test a clean new file.

Player/AI anims were really slow initially as well after UI change, but improved meanwhile too. Might still need further adjustments tho.

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Wed May 13, 2020 9:26 pm
by GabeKnight
The "stock" unit name and renamed/changed text swap in the UI preview. Looks weird, should be equalized IMO:

Screenshot 134.jpg
Screenshot 134.jpg (619.01 KiB) Viewed 3630 times

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Thu May 14, 2020 5:55 am
by GabeKnight
bebro wrote: Wed May 13, 2020 11:57 am Mousewheel scroll is ok for me now, was specifically mentioned in beta and seems fixed. Are you using old settings? Could be worth backing them up and test a clean new file.

Player/AI anims were really slow initially as well after UI change, but improved meanwhile too. Might still need further adjustments tho.
Tried it, and no joy.
As stated above, the max player/AI anim speed of the new file (options.dat) is slower than the saved settings inside the old file. It's too slow for my taste now.

And the mousewheel-scroll is okay for the left units panel, but very slow when reading texts (e.g. scen descriptions in the campaign screen) and especially super slow in the unit purchase screen.

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.4

Posted: Fri May 22, 2020 9:11 pm
by GabeKnight
When a custom name is given to a unit and you want to change that name (again), the field is blank.

Before, the previous custom name was shown and could be edited. I think that worked better.

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Wed May 27, 2020 7:50 pm
by GabeKnight
RedSteel DLC, one of the last scens, sec. objective (sec. VP) marker points to an airfield - instead the town, I guess:

Screenshot 146.jpg
Screenshot 146.jpg (942.23 KiB) Viewed 3536 times

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 5:08 am
by terminator
GabeKnight wrote: Wed May 27, 2020 7:50 pm RedSteel DLC, one of the last scens, sec. objective (sec. VP) marker points to an airfield - instead the town, I guess:
sov2_14_Kharkov_43

There’s no silver flag, so maybe we should just delete that marker?

sov2_14_Kharkov_43.jpg
sov2_14_Kharkov_43.jpg (556.59 KiB) Viewed 3524 times

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 3:55 pm
by GabeKnight
terminator wrote: Thu May 28, 2020 5:08 am There’s no silver flag, so maybe we should just delete that marker?
Probably. At first I thought the neighbouring town had a silver flag hidden under those houses, but no.

Improvement suggestions (version whatever)

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 2:23 am
by GabeKnight
AI improvement request/suggestions:

- the enemy AI team should NOT react when a "concealed" unit is approaching; only after it makes actual "contact" with it or gets attacked. The current system of how the AI "feels" the nearby precence of hidden units and tries to hunt it down is unrealisic and can be misused to "lure" whole armies into some corner hex with one commando/sniper unit.
- I don't like that the AI has complete air visibility; and I'm not absolutely sure, but it seems to even know the class of aircraft it is. Please change it back so the AI has only LOS/radar as the player.
- I think the AI arty target finding has to be improved. Currently it seems to choose the unit with the highest predicted HP-damage; and it even fires on it with three or four different arty units on the same turn... :roll: That AI behaviour is okay for direct-damage unit types (infantry, tanks, etc), but arty hits should target multiple units with high attack (or defence) stats as they should aim to reduce unit efficiency (or entrenchment) and NOT health points. Only exception to this rule may be counter-battery fire.

Improvement suggestions (version whatever)

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:03 am
by GabeKnight
Oh, and could you please, please, please bring back these new unit messages. I've almost forgot about them. Super useful while they worked in the game, a long, long time ago... :wink:

Screenshot 187.jpg
Screenshot 187.jpg (915.03 KiB) Viewed 3348 times

Improvement suggestions (version whatever)

Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 2:40 pm
by GabeKnight
Endsieg, Smolensk_43 scen:

If I place a minefield on the Roslavl hex (an aux. engineer's already deployed there!), it blocks the whole southeastern task force, as I guess there're some AI changes not being triggered without capturing that town...
I suggest to add/swap an engineer or heavy inf. unit to that AI team.

Screenshot 204.jpg
Screenshot 204.jpg (973.14 KiB) Viewed 3153 times

Re: Improvement suggestions v.8.4.1

Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:04 pm
by Mascarenhas
Also, if you want to change a unit's already given name, you have to write it over again, not edit as in the prior versions.

Improvement suggestions v.8.6.0

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 2:22 pm
by GabeKnight
Minor stuff:

Rising Sun DLC, RoadToManila - "Rosales" prim.VP is missing in the objective hex-links
Rising Sun DLC, NewZealand - prim. objective hex-link to Christchurch is off
Blitzkrieg DLC, 04_Belgium - event title "BloodSweatandTears" too big/long

I may be wrong and/or missed it, but I think the (captured) Char_B1_Germany and a6m5_zero_usa units never get to be assigned to the player as rewards...
Mascarenhas wrote: Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:04 pm Also, if you want to change a unit's already given name, you have to write it over again, not edit as in the prior versions.
Yep, mentioned that a few posts earlier, too!

Re: Improvement suggestions (version whatever)

Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2020 8:03 am
by bebro
GabeKnight wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:03 am Oh, and could you please, please, please bring back these new unit messages. I've almost forgot about them. Super useful while they worked in the game, a long, long time ago... :wink:
Everyone wants to have it back, incl. me :)

The thing is where to cram it in for the tech folks.

Re: Improvement suggestions (version whatever)

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2020 7:15 pm
by terminator
bebro wrote: Mon Sep 28, 2020 8:03 am
GabeKnight wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:03 am Oh, and could you please, please, please bring back these new unit messages. I've almost forgot about them. Super useful while they worked in the game, a long, long time ago... :wink:
Everyone wants to have it back, incl. me :)

The thing is where to cram it in for the tech folks.
Mission 2 Boot Camp :

Capture d’écran (954).jpg
Capture d’écran (954).jpg (613.58 KiB) Viewed 2932 times

Re: Improvement suggestions

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 12:00 pm
by kondi754
I wonder if it's possible to improve the graphics of ordinary/standard terrain in conditions from spring to autumn.
Desert, sea and winter snow-covered terrain look great on 4K monitors.
However, plain terrain looks decent at best :|
It would be great if it could be improved or changed :idea:

desert terrain.jpg
desert terrain.jpg (644.27 KiB) Viewed 2910 times
winter snow terrain.jpg
winter snow terrain.jpg (643.52 KiB) Viewed 2910 times
standard terrain.jpg
standard terrain.jpg (805.36 KiB) Viewed 2910 times

Re: Improvement suggestions

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2020 1:22 pm
by Horst
kondi754 wrote: Tue Oct 06, 2020 12:00 pm However, plain terrain looks decent at best :|
Yep, the open-ground's grassland has a too bright desert-like underlay. This gives a good transition from the many beaches of the old Pacific campaign scenarios but is untypical for the European theater which base soil color should rather be dark brown. Australia, on the other hand, got this typical reddish-brown soil. You can't make it right with a single terrain type for every region in the world. No idea, maybe it's possible with more climate types with different color palettes or shifts.

My own suggestion here: please make naval attacks versus land-units behave the same like land-artillery with diminishing damage on low-strength units. They decimate way too easy low-strength units by the long-range attacks.