Page 1 of 1

Why these simple rules are so satisfying

Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2019 9:56 am
by slithpile
I'm going to gush a bit more on Fields of Glory II. The rule set is really very simple, once you get used to the different troop types and what each is good at. But it does a terrific job of convincing me I'm a commander of an ancient battle.

At the start of the battle, you have complete control of your troops. You can order one flank to stop on a hill, send your cavalry in a wide flanking manoeuvre etc. You have RTS style "omniscient god"like control of your units. But once you order a unit of troops into battle, you have to accept that you are likely to lose control of them, at least for a good portion of the battle.
  • Once a unit of infantry engages in melee with another unit of infantry, they are likely stuck there fighting, turn-after-turn until one unit breaks.
  • If the opposing unit gets pushed-back, your own troops might push forward to stay engaged, or they might not. You don't get to decide.
  • If an enemy turns and flees, your unit might give chase without your order. (Some unit types are more likely to do so than others).
  • If you charge infantry towards skirmishers or cavalry, they might dance away before your units can catch them.
This all feels authentic (as someone with little knowledge of ancient warfare). It makes sense to me that a commander could give his army detailed instructions to cover the early manoeuvres of a battle. But once a unit engages in brutal melee combat, the commander can't just wander down to his unit a say "hey fellas, I know you're busy trying to not die, but you are advancing a bit too far forward, would you mind backing it up a bit?"

Not only does it feel authentic, but it adds randomness to the battle in an interesting way. Normally I expect combat randomness to be "I might do alot of damage, or very little damage". But this is a much more interesting type of randomness. Will my victorious troops push forward, or hold-the-line? That second type of randomness is much more interesting, strategically. Rather than "how much damage did I do?". It makes every battle feel unique and interesting.

Re: Why these simple rules are so satisfying

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2019 9:27 pm
by antiochosvii
I have never gotten tired of it. Each battle is a microcosm unto itself. Do yourself a favor and get FOG Empires too -- adding a campaign layer to battles is great fun and the army compositions are outside the box. I am having a blast.