LF Vs non-skirmishers
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 3:07 pm
At p60 of rulesbook there are the rules that cover LF charging/response to charge. Calling bad going uneven, rough and difficult terrain, we can summarize:
Open Terrain-> LF cannot charge unbroken non-skirmisher and must pass a CMT to receive a charge at hold
Bad Going-> LF can receive a charge at hold
In bad going likely they can charge without CMT, but I infer it from analogy because there isn't anyway in the rules. In the Full Turn Sequence I find in Impact Phase "CMT for skirmishers or missile foot wishing to charge non-skirmishers". The skirmishers in question could be just the LH, who can charge in open passing a CMT, but I'm still confused. Can you make me clear this rule?
Bye,
Mario.
Open Terrain-> LF cannot charge unbroken non-skirmisher and must pass a CMT to receive a charge at hold
Bad Going-> LF can receive a charge at hold
In bad going likely they can charge without CMT, but I infer it from analogy because there isn't anyway in the rules. In the Full Turn Sequence I find in Impact Phase "CMT for skirmishers or missile foot wishing to charge non-skirmishers". The skirmishers in question could be just the LH, who can charge in open passing a CMT, but I'm still confused. Can you make me clear this rule?
Bye,
Mario.