Page 1 of 1
Empire of the Dragon
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:47 am
by philqw78
Is there a list of the armies contained in this book yet? There isn't one on the Field of Glory site. Has one been posted here that I have missed? Nik showed me something at Warfare but I got Charltoned so don't remember much.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 8:15 pm
by flyingcrow
i dont think they have released that set of rules yet i heard that it would be released later on in the year
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:05 am
by Spartacus
Phil mate.
I don`t think there has been a list posted yet as I have been looking for it too.
But there again I might have been "Charltoned" too.
When it comes out maybe you wanna come to Wales again for a chopstick duel?
Terry.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:04 am
by philqw78
I definately know which army I'll be using when the book comes out. I was just after some advance warning of opponents. If the book is released late in the year it looks like my first use will be Usk. If it's in any of the Themes. Or is that Byzantium again?
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:12 am
by rbodleyscott
philqw78 wrote:I definately know which army I'll be using when the book comes out. I was just after some advance warning of opponents. If the book is released late in the year it looks like my first use will be Usk. If it's in any of the Themes. Or is that Byzantium again?
Definitely not Byzantine again, but the choice for next year is fairly wide, so it isn't decided yet.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:23 am
by philqw78
No Richard, is the THEME byzantine
No sense of humour in the NHS
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:40 am
by rbodleyscott
philqw78 wrote:No Richard, is the THEME byzantine
No sense of humour in the NHS
Puns don't qualify as humour.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:46 am
by philqw78
They're all I've got at this time on a Monday
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:10 am
by rbodleyscott
philqw78 wrote:They're all I've got at this time on a Monday
Do you want ti bet?
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 9:59 am
by timmy1
Dr RBS stated 'Puns don't qualify as humour.' In that case there is no hope for me as that is all I can do, humour wise.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:10 am
by philqw78
Do you want ti bet?
Ne - pal of mine would stoop so low
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:13 pm
by hammy
philqw78 wrote:Do you want ti bet?
Ne - pal of mine would stoop so low
Has Richard inadvertently invented a new form of pun? The typo-pun
The first time I read this reply I assumed it was a plain typo but on subsequent reading and bearing in mind the army closest to Phil's heart I have been forced to reconsider.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:24 pm
by rbodleyscott
hammy wrote:philqw78 wrote:Do you want ti bet?
Ne - pal of mine would stoop so low
Has Richard inadvertently invented a new form of pun? The typo-pun
The first time I read this reply I assumed it was a plain typo but on subsequent reading and bearing in mind the army closest to Phil's heart I have been forced to reconsider.
It was, of course, deliberate.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:31 pm
by hammy
rbodleyscott wrote:hammy wrote:philqw78 wrote:
Ne - pal of mine would stoop so low
Has Richard inadvertently invented a new form of pun? The typo-pun
The first time I read this reply I assumed it was a plain typo but on subsequent reading and bearing in mind the army closest to Phil's heart I have been forced to reconsider.
It was, of course, deliberate.
In which case I salute your invention