Why No Pacific Campaign?
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2018 4:22 pm
Does anybody know why there has never been a US/Japanese Pacific campaign for this game? Is there a mod somewhere? Just FYI I'm using Windows 7.
Mike
Mike
There are at least eight official scenarios that don't involve the Germans. The two USSR vs. Japan ones do indeed suck, as do the two USA vs. UK one, but the other 4 are decent.Erasermarek wrote: Tue Nov 27, 2018 9:47 am Whole Panzer Corps is about fight for Germany or against Germans (Soviet have one mission vs. Japs in fact)... Pacific theatre dont fit to this.
If you want great Pacific warfare try Order of Battle.
There are two such scenarios- "Formation" and "Achnacarry", both part of US Corps 42.
Ah, I have never been able to bring myself to play anything but the GC, although I have purchased all the DLCs on both PC and iPad long long ago.proline wrote: Wed Nov 28, 2018 4:44 amThere are two such scenarios- "Formation" and "Achnacarry", both part of US Corps 42.
Are you completly sure it is USA versus UK ???proline wrote: Wed Nov 28, 2018 4:44 amThere are two such scenarios- "Formation" and "Achnacarry", both part of US Corps 42.
In Panzer Corps, when you die in a drill you stay dead. For all intents and purposes its not a drill.Erasermarek wrote: Wed Nov 28, 2018 10:59 amNever mind... its just drill mission. I dont count to this something like that.proline wrote: Wed Nov 28, 2018 4:44 amThere are two such scenarios- "Formation" and "Achnacarry", both part of US Corps 42.
You are rightproline wrote: Wed Nov 28, 2018 8:27 pmIn Panzer Corps, when you die in a drill you stay dead. For all intents and purposes its not a drill.Erasermarek wrote: Wed Nov 28, 2018 10:59 amNever mind... its just drill mission. I dont count to this something like that.proline wrote: Wed Nov 28, 2018 4:44 am
There are two such scenarios- "Formation" and "Achnacarry", both part of US Corps 42.![]()
As I play both games I can say neither is inferiorproline wrote: Tue Nov 27, 2018 5:17 am As others have said, PzC is weak in navy. It can still be fun, however. Orkney Islands and Reykyavik are two great naval scenarios from the Sealion campaign pack. So they still could have made Pacific Corps if they wanted to. Some suggest that they were trying to somehow protect Order of Battle which has Pacific content but is much inferior to PzC in other respects. PzC2 will feature much improved naval warfare so I can guarantee there will be an insurrection if they don't deliver some good naval content!
That's because it's vastly better. I mean if these games were in different categories like one being strategy and one being real-time shooter, you could argue that popularity is affected by the size of the target audience. But since they're literally both WW2 turn-based board games they appeal to the exact same demographic and that demographic has spoken.Edgewalker wrote: Mon Dec 03, 2018 1:09 pm As I play both games I can say neither is inferior
PZC has:
- bigger player base
Following that poor man's logic Decisive Campaigns and Grigsby series are infinately worse cause they have smaller player base then simpler, strategy-lite likes PZC.proline wrote: Mon Dec 03, 2018 3:29 pmThat's because it's vastly better. I mean if these games were in different categories like one being strategy and one being real-time shooter, you could argue that popularity is affected by the size of the target audience. But since they're literally both WW2 turn-based board games they appeal to the exact same demographic and that demographic has spoken.Edgewalker wrote: Mon Dec 03, 2018 1:09 pm As I play both games I can say neither is inferior
PZC has:
- bigger player base
Conversely, the fact that there's one guy out there who says he loves game X does not make game X good. It simply makes it good in that one guy's mind. Hell there's someone out there who loves Panzer Strategy and that game is an awful Russian rip-off. Cream rises to the top- if you make 10 games that appeal to the exact same group of people they'll end up playing the best of those 10. (And as I said before, I'm not talking about comparing games that appeal to different demographics where the demographics are different sizes.)Edgewalker wrote: Mon Dec 03, 2018 4:40 pmFollowing that poor man's logic Decisive Campaigns and Grigsby series are infinately worse cause they have smaller player base then simpler, strategy-lite likes PZC.proline wrote: Mon Dec 03, 2018 3:29 pmThat's because it's vastly better. I mean if these games were in different categories like one being strategy and one being real-time shooter, you could argue that popularity is affected by the size of the target audience. But since they're literally both WW2 turn-based board games they appeal to the exact same demographic and that demographic has spoken.Edgewalker wrote: Mon Dec 03, 2018 1:09 pm As I play both games I can say neither is inferior
PZC has:
- bigger player base
Maybe in your world bigger group of people nodding heads behind your back makes you right, hardly suprising, just don't expect me to tag along.