Mixed formations
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:11 am
Why didn't the Greeks, while getting owned by Romans, put spearmen and or swordsmen at the front of their pike units to prevent the disruption of pikes? Put a few lines of archers behind to fire arrers over and it's an easy win. Maybe.
Roman Legionaires. Fought them, tough b*stards. In my Thracian days in a past life. Were they almost immune to arrow fire because of their testude formation? I can't see a way through that, so I guess so.
Also, supporting archers may seem a bit overpriced, but when you use a front rank base, the archer fill in the 2nd rank and fight at the same poa.
Dailami: mf, imp foot, ar, dr, superior
Archers: lf, un protected, drilled, superior.
So there is a saving on armour and mf vs lf poa. For less than 1/2 the price.
I got sidetracked.
Roman Legionaires. Fought them, tough b*stards. In my Thracian days in a past life. Were they almost immune to arrow fire because of their testude formation? I can't see a way through that, so I guess so.
Also, supporting archers may seem a bit overpriced, but when you use a front rank base, the archer fill in the 2nd rank and fight at the same poa.
Dailami: mf, imp foot, ar, dr, superior
Archers: lf, un protected, drilled, superior.
So there is a saving on armour and mf vs lf poa. For less than 1/2 the price.
I got sidetracked.