Slitherine

Can we please have an explanation about what is required about each steam achievement?

I am not sure whether it is intentional that as-yet-unlocked achievements should be hidden. I will investigate.

It was an oversight.

You can now see them all (including requirements) here:

https://steamcommunity.com/stats/660160/achievements

Nice! Thanks!

rbodleyscott wrote:It was an oversight.

You can now see them all (including requirements) here:

https://steamcommunity.com/stats/660160/achievements

Game should be called Shield of Glory.

Yuppie i am one of the Horse Lords

I've been trying to be lucky enough to get the unlucky achievement. It's the only one besides the 3 multiplayer ones that I don't have. I noticed on steam stats that it is the only one that nobody has. After checking the manual I have to wonder if it is even possible. The manual states it is giving only a general explanation but by the given I see a fail with a 1,1 ; 1,2 ; 1,3 ; or a 2,2 roll. I just need reassurance that it's possible.

thekingscousin wrote:I've been trying to be lucky enough to get the unlucky achievement. It's the only one besides the 3 multiplayer ones that I don't have. I noticed on steam stats that it is the only one that nobody has. After checking the manual I have to wonder if it is even possible. The manual states it is giving only a general explanation but by the given I see a fail with a 1,1 ; 1,2 ; 1,3 ; or a 2,2 roll. I just need reassurance that it's possible.

It seems that the code is working, but is in fact impossible to achieve. This is because the maximum positive modifier a unit could have is +2, which means that it isn't possible to have a fail that could only happen on a score of 2, as even with +2 modifier 3 would also be a fail.

We will look to replacing it with an Achievement that is actually achievable!

New achievement replacement suggestion: Winning at legate (or higher) with a single digit loss %
(less than 10%). Could be named after a leader known not to waste human resources.

thekingscousin wrote:New achievement replacement suggestion: Winning at legate (or higher) with a single digit loss %
(less than 10%). Could be named after a leader known not to waste human resources.

Thanks

thekingscousin wrote:New achievement replacement suggestion: Winning at legate (or higher) with a single digit loss %
(less than 10%). Could be named after a leader known not to waste human resources.

Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus Cuntactor ?

Achievement Idea.

'Against All Odds'

Win a historical battle on Deity fighting as the side that historically lost.

Adraeth wrote:

thekingscousin wrote:New achievement replacement suggestion: Winning at legate (or higher) with a single digit loss %
(less than 10%). Could be named after a leader known not to waste human resources.

Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus Cuntactor ?

Point taken. How about 'Mother' ?

thekingscousin wrote:Point taken. How about 'Mother' ?

One pill makes you larger, and one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you, don't do anything at all