How (Not) to Win: Late Romans vs. Huns
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:14 pm
The final round of the Legions Triumphant tournament was a battle between late Romans and the Huns. I played through this battle a few times in hotseat mode, trying to get my head around the Hunnic army. In each of these battles, I won with the Romans, with my closest game ending 57-62 but all others decisively for the Roman side. Apparently having found a winning strategy for the Romans, I employed it against my opponent in the tournament and won convincingly; but in the mirror game I lost plating as the Huns. The matter, then, remained: could the Huns win, and if so how?
The answers, as you'll see below, are: 1) yes; and 2) fairly easily.
Here's an outline of the strategy I had developed:
The Roman army is comprised of the strongest infantry units available to them, as well as a mix of cavalry units in reserve and a flank-guard comprised of all light units. I use this force as follows:
- On the flank, the light troops draw off enemy light troops while I advance on the main Hunnic line with my infantry and cavalry
- When the light troops engage, I allow them to fall back a little, so the fighting happens behind my main infantry line and so enemy light troops are exposed to my horse
- My infantry continue to advance, pushing back the Hunnic cavalry which are unable to do significant damage against them and cannot face them in melee, while my horse move in support of the light units
- Because they have been pushed back and the infantry block them, the core Hunnic cavalry cannot support their flanking force which are thus destroyed
- From this point, victory is more or less assured and is simply a matter of chasing down Hunnic horse archers
My opponent for this battle was Nosy_Rat, who has reasonably argued that the knack here is simply not to face the Roman foot and instead fight primarily on the flank. So this is the opening of the battle - almost no Hunnic troops are deployed to face my infantry, with most on the flank (currently hidden by the hill):
At this early stage, however, I am still confident that I can use my strategy, so I advance my infantry at an angle to try and cut off my opponent's light troops from their heavier horse archers, as before:
The answers, as you'll see below, are: 1) yes; and 2) fairly easily.
Here's an outline of the strategy I had developed:
The Roman army is comprised of the strongest infantry units available to them, as well as a mix of cavalry units in reserve and a flank-guard comprised of all light units. I use this force as follows:
- On the flank, the light troops draw off enemy light troops while I advance on the main Hunnic line with my infantry and cavalry
- When the light troops engage, I allow them to fall back a little, so the fighting happens behind my main infantry line and so enemy light troops are exposed to my horse
- My infantry continue to advance, pushing back the Hunnic cavalry which are unable to do significant damage against them and cannot face them in melee, while my horse move in support of the light units
- Because they have been pushed back and the infantry block them, the core Hunnic cavalry cannot support their flanking force which are thus destroyed
- From this point, victory is more or less assured and is simply a matter of chasing down Hunnic horse archers
My opponent for this battle was Nosy_Rat, who has reasonably argued that the knack here is simply not to face the Roman foot and instead fight primarily on the flank. So this is the opening of the battle - almost no Hunnic troops are deployed to face my infantry, with most on the flank (currently hidden by the hill):
At this early stage, however, I am still confident that I can use my strategy, so I advance my infantry at an angle to try and cut off my opponent's light troops from their heavier horse archers, as before: