Page 1 of 1

Cohesion Testing if losing vs Lancers

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:23 pm
by stenic
I'm sure this has been anserred before but I can't find the thread.

If the lancers do not get their lance POA (ie vs steady spear in impact), do opponents still count the -1 on the CT test for losing vs lancers ?

Thanks,

Steve

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:44 pm
by hammy
Yes.

If you lose to lancers whatever the situation you have lost to lancers. Just because the lancers don't get a POA it doesn't mean they don't have the long spears or the attitude.

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:55 pm
by stenic
Hammy you are a star to respond so quick. Thanks.

I'd though so but want to verify before I pontificated with authority :)

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:17 pm
by philqw78
before I pontificated with authority
But you have to temper that with the fact that it's Hammy's authority :lol:

Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:30 am
by gozerius
What's interesting is everybody that loses to lancers suffers the penalty, even other lancers.

Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 5:52 am
by daleivan
gozerius wrote:What's interesting is everybody that loses to lancers suffers the penalty, even other lancers.
Agreed--that's very important to keep in mind :)

Dale

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 9:59 am
by bobm
Have you lost to lancers if they are a flanking/rear unit rather than the enemy to your front? If so do they have to cause at least one of the hits?

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:06 am
by hammy
bobm wrote:Have you lost to lancers if they are an overlapping unit rather than to your front? If so do they have to cause at least one of the hits?
As overlaps only count in melee and lancer only counts at impact this is moot. However if a BG of MF is fighting enemy foot frontally but mounted as an overlap then they would take the -1 for MF fighting mounted.

The lancers don't have to inflict any hits to mean that a BG was fighting them but obviously the other non lancers would have to inflict a fair number of hits to cause a test if the lancers all miss.

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:25 am
by bobm
Thanks...I used overlap when I meant flanking, I edited the question but too late!!

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:50 am
by hammy
bobm wrote:Thanks...I used overlap when I meant flanking, I edited the question but too late!!
Ahh, serves me right for answering too quickly ;)

If the lancers hit you in the flank then they are still lancers but in this case they are a lot more likely to force you to test and if they win by 2 you could well be testing at -4 (1HP3B, beaten by 2, lancers and disrupted because of the flank charge). Just like if you are in a wood or marsh, they are still lancers just lancers that don't get a POA so are far less likely to beat you.

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 11:12 am
by bobm
...not trying to turn this into a marathon; honest!...but it did crop up last night. The unit lost to the foot that had charged its front. Lancers had charged into flank at same time but all "missed"......so had they lost to Lancers?

Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:16 pm
by philqw78
No they either drew with them or beat them. (You didn't say if you caused a hit back)

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:09 am
by terrys
If you lose a combet you get the -1 for facing lancers regardless of whether or not the lancers beat you:

The rule states:
Any troops testing for having lost impact phase combat even partly against lancers**

** Only applies when testing as a result of losing a close combat.The modifier for fighting
specific enemy troop types applies whether or not these inflicted more hits on the battle group
than it inflicted on them.