POA Question
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:07 pm
I think we got this one correct but just wanted to get other's opinion.
Had a situation where a Kushan Cataphract was engaged to its front with a Sassanid Cataphract. The Kushan was disrupted with a general. The Kushan was charged in the flank by a fresh Sassanid LH. In the impact, the Kushan's fought at -- POA and the Sassanid LH ++ POA. No problem there. The Kushan lost and fragmented.
In melee, the Kushan was fighting with 1 base against the Sassanid LH. The Kushan gets a + POA for sword and +POA for better armor but a - POA for fighting in two directions. Would the Kushan add another + POA for two better armor to give the Kushan a net ++ POA or would he fight at a net + POA?
We fought at a net + POA hitting on 4s against the LH. In the end it did not matter as the Sassanid Cataphracts scored 3 hits in melee and the Kushans broke but just wanted to see how others saw this.
AAR with pictures coming later this morning (7 AM here).
Had a situation where a Kushan Cataphract was engaged to its front with a Sassanid Cataphract. The Kushan was disrupted with a general. The Kushan was charged in the flank by a fresh Sassanid LH. In the impact, the Kushan's fought at -- POA and the Sassanid LH ++ POA. No problem there. The Kushan lost and fragmented.
In melee, the Kushan was fighting with 1 base against the Sassanid LH. The Kushan gets a + POA for sword and +POA for better armor but a - POA for fighting in two directions. Would the Kushan add another + POA for two better armor to give the Kushan a net ++ POA or would he fight at a net + POA?
We fought at a net + POA hitting on 4s against the LH. In the end it did not matter as the Sassanid Cataphracts scored 3 hits in melee and the Kushans broke but just wanted to see how others saw this.
AAR with pictures coming later this morning (7 AM here).
