Page 1 of 5

LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:07 pm
by fogman
Romans, Carthaginians, Syracusans, Tarentans, Lucanians, Samnites, Gauls, and the arrival of Pyrrhus. Who will be lords of Italy and Sicily?



Interestingly, this is the same period as FOG 2. Good for comparison if you play both.

------------------------
recruitment closed

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:35 pm
by Edmund_Blackadder
I'd like to take part please.

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 10:14 am
by TDefender
me too!

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 1:50 pm
by Enakan
I'm your huckleberry!!!

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:20 am
by fogman
We have enough to start but we’ll wait until next week-end. I’ll try to get two more from the veterans as 6 is the perfect number.

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:09 am
by iandavidsmith
I'll join in there is room ,
Cheers
Ian

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 6:28 am
by Londo
And me too for #6! :)

Sorry for not replying to your PM fogman, been playing in another online wargame competition* which was soaking up all my gaming time and driving me to the point of mental breakdown! But that's over now, and some more fogman mayhem would be great!

* (Online Paths of Glory, the classic WW1 boardgame.)

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:12 pm
by fogman
We’ll be using version 2 of the scenarios. Delete the first versions first before installing. Scout the scenarios by playing hot seat first before the tournament.
LOI280BC Carthaginians vs Pyrrhus v2.zip
(8.11 KiB) Downloaded 240 times
LOI280BC Carthaginians vs Syracusans v2.zip
(8.07 KiB) Downloaded 246 times
LOI280BC Lucanians vs Tarentans v2.zip
(7.97 KiB) Downloaded 239 times

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 3:14 pm
by fogman
continued,
LOI280BC Pyrrhus vs Romans v2.zip
(7.91 KiB) Downloaded 248 times
LOI280BC Romans vs Gallo-Samnites v2.zip
(8.15 KiB) Downloaded 279 times

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:45 pm
by fogman
First Round
Make sure you play with version 2 (above)

Carthaginians vs Pyrrhus

TDefender (Pyrrhus) vs Enakan (Carthaginians)
Enakan (Pyrrhus) vs Fogman (Carthaginians)
Fogman (Pyrrhus) vs Iandavidsmith (Carthaginians)
Iandavidsmith (Pyrrhus) vs Londo (Carthaginians)
Londo (Pyrrhus) vs Edmund (Carthaginians)
Edmund (Pyrrhus) vs TDefender (Carthaginians)

The Epirot player initiates the challenge.

Historical Deployment
No Double Move, No Fog of War.
Use password.

Enjoy

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:54 pm
by fogman
Challenge for Iandavidsmith

Fogman (Epirots) vs Iandavismith (Carthaginians)

pw: pyrrhus (can’t remember if majuscule P or not)

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 2:49 pm
by TDefender
just to ask: why no fog of war?

- Battle hosted for Enakan
Pass: Epiro

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:35 pm
by fogman
TDefender wrote:just to ask: why no fog of war?
Because fog of war can not be implemented at this scale. The concept of "if one unit sees something, the whole army sees it” is wrong. Also, a line of cavalry or elephants can be hidden by infantry in front of them, which is even more wrong.

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 8:59 pm
by Edmund_Blackadder
Challenge up for TDefender password TDef

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:56 pm
by TDefender
ehm sorry I've aready hosted Edmund (see post above) moreover the game you hosted is with both FoV and double move on...

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 3:35 am
by fogman
TDefender wrote:ehm sorry I've aready hosted Edmund (see post above) moreover the game you hosted is with both FoV and double move on...
You as Pyrrhus host Enakan.
But Edmund as Pyrrhus host you. And yes Edmund should re-do his challenge without FoW and Double Move.

In effect, you play both sides of the scenario but not against the same player.

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:42 am
by Enakan
Hey!

I had the same problem a month or two ago about downloading scenarios.

Other players could, I just had them challenge me to play. Could you guys please do all the heavy WORK and challenge this PC challenged kind of old fart???

:D :D :D

Please?

Paul

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 1:19 pm
by Londo
fogman wrote:Challenge for Iandavidsmith

Fogman (Epirots) vs Iandavismith (Carthaginians)

pw: pyrrhus (can’t remember if majuscule P or not)
I had to look that up in a dictionary: majuscule, the opposite of miniscule. You learn new things here all the time! :)

Game up for Edmund.

pw majuscule

PS Fogman, what is the situation in this scenario? I realise it's hypothetical, but why is Pyrrhus, one of the better generals of his day, fighting the Carthaginian line while enemy forces bear down on his flank and rear? If he loses, his army will get crushed like a bug.

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:09 pm
by Enakan
Hey Fogman?

Got started with TDefender in that game, could you challenge me please in ours? Still groping my way around this laptop.....

Thanks!

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:27 pm
by fogman
Enakan wrote:Hey Fogman?

Got started with TDefender in that game, could you challenge me please in ours? Still groping my way around this laptop.....

Thanks!
enakan (epirotes) vs fogman (carthaginians)

password: minuscule