Page 1 of 1

LF Charging Camp

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:17 pm
by ney63
Can a Battle group of Light Foot charge a camp??
I was told no and i believed what i was told,but since looked it up and how it is written i believe you can.
It says if a enemy Battle group chargers a unfortified camp it is sacked but only a Battle troops can defeat a Fortified camp. page 20
So LF are not Battle Troops but are a Battle group. Page 18

restrictions to charge LF page 64.
A BG of entirely of LF cannot charge un broken non skirmishers in the open. IS a camp classed as a unbroken non skirmish troops???

I might be just having a Blonde moment :lol:

Andy E

Re: LF Charging Camp

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:07 pm
by notrum
LF can charge an UF camp page 73
Fortified camps can only be defeated by foot battle troops, pages 94 and 18.
So Andy you are correct.

Steve

Re: LF Charging Camp

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:12 pm
by petedalby
Can a Battle group of Light Foot charge a camp??
If it is unfortified - most definitely yes - unless the LF are Fragmented. You wuz robbed.

Re: LF Charging Camp

Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:53 pm
by philqw78
But as Andy said LF cannot charge unbroken non-skirmishers in the open.
Badly worded or the intention?

Anyway shouldn't you be publishing the R&R for roll call Andy? Just screw over the list for the scoundrel that did this to you

Re: LF Charging Camp

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 6:20 am
by ney63
Phil just waiting for one more list from Jon Aker (YET AGAIN LATE) Name and shame time, he promised on Monday ASAP but still waiting :evil: ,and waiting for one to be corrected.
Will post riders then hopefully soon.

Andy

Re: LF Charging Camp

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 6:25 am
by ney63
notrum wrote:LF can charge an UF camp page 73
Fortified camps can only be defeated by foot battle troops, pages 94 and 18.
So Andy you are correct.

Steve
So you could charge a Fortified camp but you would be there a bloody long time :lol:
andy

Re: LF Charging Camp

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:17 am
by petedalby
Badly worded or the intention?
The wording on P73 couldn't be clearer.

Re: LF Charging Camp

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:05 am
by philqw78
petedalby wrote:
Badly worded or the intention?
The wording on P73 couldn't be clearer.
Nor could page 64

Re: LF Charging Camp

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 6:16 pm
by petedalby
Nor could page 64
Agreed - no mention of camps in there at all.

Re: LF Charging Camp

Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:16 pm
by grahambriggs
philqw78 wrote:But as Andy said LF cannot charge unbroken non-skirmishers in the open.
Badly worded or the intention?

Anyway shouldn't you be publishing the R&R for roll call Andy? Just screw over the list for the scoundrel that did this to you
P18 defines Battle Troops (Non-skirmishers) as any troops other than LF or LH (or mixed BGs containing some LF). Camps are not troops, so LF can charge unfortified ones.

Re: LF Charging Camp

Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2017 8:45 am
by petedalby
Page 22 also states that a camp is not a BG.