Page 1 of 1
Fully defining troops as they are deployed
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:47 pm
by daleivan
Page 147 states that you must define fully the troop types of all your battle groups as they are deployed on the table.
Does this include quality? I assume that it does but just want to be sure
Dale
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:08 pm
by philqw78
Everything apparently, carrying stakes, allied or not, etc
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:23 pm
by ars_belli
Yep, "define fully" encompasses all troop ratings and features.
Cheers,
Scott
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:39 pm
by spike
ars_belli wrote:Yep, "define fully" encompasses all troop ratings and features.
Cheers,
Scott
Not always
where noted in the army lists the true nature of certain BG's can be hidden , see p.39 of immortal fire as an example.
Spike
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:55 pm
by ars_belli
I stand corrected. Unless otherwise specified in the army lists, "define fully" encompasses all troop ratings and features.
cheers,
Scott
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 1:31 pm
by daleivan
ars_belli wrote:I stand corrected. Unless otherwise specified in the army lists, "define fully" encompasses all troop ratings and features.
cheers,
Scott
I ran across the same sort of thing while reading through Storm of Arrows and seeing that, for instance, in the Hundred Years War and WoTR English lists dismounted men-at-arms and billmen could interpenetrate bowmen and visa versa, an exception to the normal rules on interpenetration
Dale