Multiplayer
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:35 am
Seriously no ladder?
Games been out 4 years?
You've made money I bet it's 50% of gross income.
And you have encouraged, allowed, fostered Order of Battle?
No doubt it appears to be a fine game but what? By pushing it your killing PzC. It's two competing systems.
You thinking "well we make a new ogre vs elves game" and pimp OOB and ride the "new" dlc money machine?
Lol.
There is nothing wrong with PzC. Nobody is interested in the many itenerations of PzC.
Expand it and value it.
Ideas missed:
1. Slithering sponsored multiplayer competitions
2. Multiplayer rankings and valuation of participants and sponsorship of community
Ideas missed:
1. Rule set can always be amended
2. PzC is base of Chess
Multiplayer and community is all encompassing
Imagine a 100 member tournament, single elimination
If the scenarios are designed to allow core, plus prestige the possibilities are quite numerous
My biggest beef is failed realization, you've improved a 1995 game.
I'm here because I have interest, because I paid and frankly it's fun and chess but what's it going to take 100 years till someone makes a ladder, puts some sponsorship behind it and the players who have skill get recognition.
Four years after the game came out and I'm playing multiplayer:
It works, A+.
10 balanced scenarios?
I'm playing 8 right now.
One if not both starts with 3 objectives of which you must hold 3 for victory.
Turtle much?
DV takes all objectives but why bother?
Some scenarios have you starting at disadvantage while opponent has initially 3 objectives which is all he needs for victory.
Not enough scenarios allow you to improvise or change the obvious course of action.
Seriously you couldn't play the 10 offered balanced scenarios more than once and not be bored?
Why?
Where is the Multiplayer Forum?
Who are the Multiplayer Kings of PzC.
Where is the Multiplayer ongoing Campaigns. The "best of the best"?
Games been out 4 years?
You've made money I bet it's 50% of gross income.
And you have encouraged, allowed, fostered Order of Battle?
No doubt it appears to be a fine game but what? By pushing it your killing PzC. It's two competing systems.
You thinking "well we make a new ogre vs elves game" and pimp OOB and ride the "new" dlc money machine?
Lol.
There is nothing wrong with PzC. Nobody is interested in the many itenerations of PzC.
Expand it and value it.
Ideas missed:
1. Slithering sponsored multiplayer competitions
2. Multiplayer rankings and valuation of participants and sponsorship of community
Ideas missed:
1. Rule set can always be amended
2. PzC is base of Chess
Multiplayer and community is all encompassing
Imagine a 100 member tournament, single elimination
If the scenarios are designed to allow core, plus prestige the possibilities are quite numerous
My biggest beef is failed realization, you've improved a 1995 game.
I'm here because I have interest, because I paid and frankly it's fun and chess but what's it going to take 100 years till someone makes a ladder, puts some sponsorship behind it and the players who have skill get recognition.
Four years after the game came out and I'm playing multiplayer:
It works, A+.
10 balanced scenarios?
I'm playing 8 right now.
One if not both starts with 3 objectives of which you must hold 3 for victory.
Turtle much?
DV takes all objectives but why bother?
Some scenarios have you starting at disadvantage while opponent has initially 3 objectives which is all he needs for victory.
Not enough scenarios allow you to improvise or change the obvious course of action.
Seriously you couldn't play the 10 offered balanced scenarios more than once and not be bored?
Why?
Where is the Multiplayer Forum?
Who are the Multiplayer Kings of PzC.
Where is the Multiplayer ongoing Campaigns. The "best of the best"?
