"Other firing"
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 9:08 pm
Page 33, right-hand column, regarding flank and rear attacks says:
"A move that satisfies all of the above is considered to have assaulted the flank or rear of the enemy unit. IF THERE IS NO OTHER FIRING THAT COULD STOP THE ASSAULT COMPLETING, the unit being assaulted drops a level of cohesion BEFORE it can fire defensively at other assaulting units, otherwise it drops a level of cohesion AFTER it has fired any defensive fire..." (capitalized italics for my emphasis, non-italicized caps were left as in the actual text)
What is the "other firing" that could stop the assault? Only assaulted units can fire during the assault phase (possibly assisted by other units if the assaulting unit is in the supporting fire zone). Does the "other firing" refer to these flanking supporting fire units? I wouldn't think so as they only add a die to the fire of the assaulted unit, rather than firing separately (and a unit assaulted in the flank or rear cannot fire at the flank/rear assaulting unit). I can only conceive that the "other firing" refers to the case in which the assaulting unit actually contacts or assaults more than one unit, as only assaulted units can fire.
Is there some other meaning?
I've seen a reference to "opportunity fire" in these discussions but have found no rule which allows it.
I suspect this question has been asked before and I've simply missed seeing it here.
"A move that satisfies all of the above is considered to have assaulted the flank or rear of the enemy unit. IF THERE IS NO OTHER FIRING THAT COULD STOP THE ASSAULT COMPLETING, the unit being assaulted drops a level of cohesion BEFORE it can fire defensively at other assaulting units, otherwise it drops a level of cohesion AFTER it has fired any defensive fire..." (capitalized italics for my emphasis, non-italicized caps were left as in the actual text)
What is the "other firing" that could stop the assault? Only assaulted units can fire during the assault phase (possibly assisted by other units if the assaulting unit is in the supporting fire zone). Does the "other firing" refer to these flanking supporting fire units? I wouldn't think so as they only add a die to the fire of the assaulted unit, rather than firing separately (and a unit assaulted in the flank or rear cannot fire at the flank/rear assaulting unit). I can only conceive that the "other firing" refers to the case in which the assaulting unit actually contacts or assaults more than one unit, as only assaulted units can fire.
Is there some other meaning?
I've seen a reference to "opportunity fire" in these discussions but have found no rule which allows it.
I suspect this question has been asked before and I've simply missed seeing it here.