Lexington - who else didn't upgrade?
Posted: Sat May 16, 2015 8:11 pm
The USS Lexington and her sister ship Saratoga were originally planned as Battlecruisers.
"The Bureau of Construction and Repair was not then convinced that aircraft could be an effective and sufficient armament for a warship. Thus the design as carriers included a substantial gun battery of eight 8"/55 caliber guns in four twin gun turrets, two pairs of superfiring turrets fore and aft of the island." (Wikipedia)
This shows as the Lexington has a range of 6 and quite some firepower, but less anti-air and anti-torpedo capability as its later upgrade or the Yorktown class.
Yet I didn't upgrade. The upgrade removes 3 range and a lot of firepower but increases defenses. The ship sunk transports and supply ships and even two destroyers already and I plan to use it as artillery platform in some future invasion scenarios.
How about you? Did you upgrade, and if you did so, did you feel somewhat sorry when doing so?
"The Bureau of Construction and Repair was not then convinced that aircraft could be an effective and sufficient armament for a warship. Thus the design as carriers included a substantial gun battery of eight 8"/55 caliber guns in four twin gun turrets, two pairs of superfiring turrets fore and aft of the island." (Wikipedia)
This shows as the Lexington has a range of 6 and quite some firepower, but less anti-air and anti-torpedo capability as its later upgrade or the Yorktown class.
Yet I didn't upgrade. The upgrade removes 3 range and a lot of firepower but increases defenses. The ship sunk transports and supply ships and even two destroyers already and I plan to use it as artillery platform in some future invasion scenarios.
How about you? Did you upgrade, and if you did so, did you feel somewhat sorry when doing so?