Slitherine

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:46 pm**

Any idea when the Philistines and other Biblical armies will be available ?

Cheers

Posted: **Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:44 pm**

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:30 am**

Will the Urartians be included in the biblical list?

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:16 am**

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:02 pm**

nikgaukroger wrote:Yes.

If thats yes to Urartians that is superb news- I have a rather nice Urartian Army that was rarely used under DBM as it was such a complete turkey.

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:16 pm**

flamingpig0 wrote:
nikgaukroger wrote:Yes.

If thats yes to Urartians that is superb news- I have a rather nice Urartian Army that was rarely used under DBM as it was such a complete turkey.

It looks quite viable under FOG with good cavalry, light and heavy chariots, and lots of Protected MF in mixed BGs 1/2 light spear, swordsmen, 1/2 bow - similar to the Assyrians.

Posted: **Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:19 am**

rbodleyscott wrote:
flamingpig0 wrote:
nikgaukroger wrote:Yes.

If thats yes to Urartians that is superb news- I have a rather nice Urartian Army that was rarely used under DBM as it was such a complete turkey.
It looks quite viable under FOG with good cavalry, light and heavy chariots, and lots of Protected MF in mixed BGs 1/2 light spear, swordsmen, 1/2 bow - similar to the Assyrians.

Are the mixed MF BG's compulsory as the old DM list the main inf were purely Ax

Posted: **Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:30 pm**

flamingpig0 wrote:Are the mixed MF BG's compulsory as the old DM list the main inf were purely Ax

Only for royal army troops. Guard and Provincial troops can be separate.

Posted: **Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:56 pm**

rbodleyscott wrote:
flamingpig0 wrote:Are the mixed MF BG's compulsory as the old DM list the main inf were purely Ax

Only for royal army troops. Guard and Provincial troops can be separate.

Thats a relief, although I will probably still have to buy and paint a number of archers.