Melee Overlap Question
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:23 pm
Hi. We had a situation last night that raised a question.
RRRR
RRRR EEEE
R=Romans, E=Carthage elephants
The Romans on the left are facing down, the other two units are in melee
One side felt that for the Romans on the left to join in the melee, they would have to turn 90 degrees and charge in the next turn.
The other side felt that, as the distance was less than half a base width, the leftmost Roomans could slide over and add themselves in as an overlap.
The situation was complicated by the fact that the left Romans would have to slide sideways and *backwards* and few millimeteres; the diagram in the only shows a unit sliding sideways and *forwards*.
In the end we decided that they could slide over and add themselves as an overlap. Did we do this correctly?
RRRR
RRRR EEEE
R=Romans, E=Carthage elephants
The Romans on the left are facing down, the other two units are in melee
One side felt that for the Romans on the left to join in the melee, they would have to turn 90 degrees and charge in the next turn.
The other side felt that, as the distance was less than half a base width, the leftmost Roomans could slide over and add themselves in as an overlap.
The situation was complicated by the fact that the left Romans would have to slide sideways and *backwards* and few millimeteres; the diagram in the only shows a unit sliding sideways and *forwards*.
In the end we decided that they could slide over and add themselves as an overlap. Did we do this correctly?