Slitherine

Just thought it may be useful for people to flag any possible errata for the army lists in one place - perhaps a moderator could make this sticky?

One I know has been pointed out on one of the FoG Yahoo lists:

Rise of Rome, page 18 in the Gallic list the LF Javelinmen in the main list and allied list should have Javelins shooting capability.

Good call Nik.

Italian Condotta - Venetian Stradiots - fielded as Cavalry they retain a shooting capability with javelins? I didn't think that was possible? And the points look wrong to me but as I don't have my rules yet I can't be certain.

Pete

petedalby wrote:Good call Nik.

Italian Condotta - Venetian Stradiots - fielded as Cavalry they retain a shooting capability with javelins? I didn't think that was possible? And the points look wrong to me but as I don't have my rules yet I can't be certain.

Thanks Pete, they should not have javelins capability - take that away and the points are correct.

Rise of Rome - page 43 - Later Seleucid list. Troop Type headings 'Armour,Quality,Training' are printed in wrong order.

MADcozy

Just having a quick scan through "Storm of Arrows" and I see on P 30, Anglo-Irish, the Galloglaigh have a shooting capability of -3.

Is this to represent their legendary skill at "dodge-ball" in avoiding incoming missiles, or the minor shooting effect of hurling potatoes at their opponents?

I really can't believe it it could be so mundane as to be a typo....

Regards

Dave M

davem wrote:
Is this to represent their legendary skill at "dodge-ball" in avoiding incoming missiles, or the minor shooting effect of hurling potatoes at their opponents?

Dodge-ball as potatoes had not been introduced to Ireland at this date

Hi Nick,
it would be a good thing if you edit your first post in this topic to have a list of errata confirmed.
After, if you want, I could create a pdf to download and to print it.

nicofig wrote:Hi Nick,
it would be a good thing if you edit your first post in this topic to have a list of errata confirmed.
After, if you want, I could create a pdf to download and to print it.

No need. The errata will be posted on the official FoG site.

OK, it will be perfect. And when do you think this errata and the faq will be posted ?

nicofig wrote:OK, it will be perfect. And when do you think this errata and the faq will be posted ?

Soon. I have already sent several updates to JD.

Thank you Richard. It's a great thing than you are so close with the players.

Swiss page 60. knights and men-at-arms, bases per BG states 4-8. Should this be 4-6.

Probably as there are no other 8 base BGs - however, it is always possible that we had a reason and there is nothing that says you can't have an 8 base mounted unit.

It may be a "feature" of the list

nikgaukroger wrote:Probably as there are no other 8 base BGs - however, it is always possible that we had a reason and there is nothing that says you can't have an 8 base mounted unit.

It may be a "feature" of the list

Hmm, let me think, an 8 base average BG that costs a mere 168 points. Somehow I don't see it as a game breaker, infact I challenge anyone to try using it and do well.

hammy wrote: Hmm, let me think, an 8 base average BG that costs a mere 168 points. Somehow I don't see it as a game breaker, infact I challenge anyone to try using it and do well.

No imagination it can be easily featured in a 2400 point game.

hood_mick wrote:Swiss page 60. knights and men-at-arms, bases per BG states 4-8. Should this be 4-6.

Yes

a small typo - in Storm of Arrows, page 17 - the WoTR list. The Mercenary Handgunners have Protected as a Troop Type when it should be an armour class.

Medieval Castillian, page 81, Javelinmen, Medium Foot, Unprotected, Poor. The U has been missed off Unprotected.

No matter how many times you check, double check, and recheck again there are always typos that slip through. It is really frustrating, isn't it?

Marc

babyshark wrote:No matter how many times you check, double check, and recheck again there are always typos that slip through. It is really frustrating, isn't it?

Yup