Page 1 of 2

Bursting Through or not

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:53 am
by titanu
Image

In the picture the unit with the measuring stick (3 bases wide and 3 deep in places) has failed a CMT not to charge and therefor is charging the unit at the bottom of the picture.
It must burst trough the routing unit just to it's front. But when it bursts through there is no room behind it for the routers to move into.

The problem is also complicated by the unit by the side of the charges (with a white counter) has been caught in the flank by the unit pursuing the routers.

A number of solutions were mooted:
1a) Move the burst through unit behind both friendly units.
1b) Move the burst through unit behind both friendly units and count the non-charging unit as having been routed through and so dropping a cohesion level.
2) Move the non charging unit AND the enemy unit in contact with it back to allow the burst through unit room.
3) Disallow the involuntary charge.

Or are there any other ideas?

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2014 8:31 am
by grahambriggs
I think probably option 2 is the best. However, the charge target looks to be light foot in the open. So that will evade and perhaps the charger will roll high thus removing the problem.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2014 8:46 am
by titanu
grahambriggs wrote:I think probably option 2 is the best. However, the charge target looks to be light foot in the open. So that will evade and perhaps the charger will roll high thus removing the problem.
No they are medium foot, it is not easy to see the 3 figures per base.

This was in fact the solution chosen by the Umpire.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:06 pm
by petedalby
All covered on page 51.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:15 pm
by philqw78
What if we are too lazy to look at page whatever it was?

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:49 am
by gozerius
The routing troops cannot move behind the charging BG due to the presence of the friendly BG in contact with enemy.
So:
If it is impossible to shift friends back sufficiently to make room, the shock troops do not move at all and (if steady) drop to disrupted.
page 51, third bullet

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2014 8:31 am
by dave_r
gozerius wrote:The routing troops cannot move behind the charging BG due to the presence of the friendly BG in contact with enemy.
So:
If it is impossible to shift friends back sufficiently to make room, the shock troops do not move at all and (if steady) drop to disrupted.
page 51, third bullet
What would happen if the shock troops were already disrupted then? Presumably nothing?

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2014 8:55 am
by grahambriggs
gozerius wrote:The routing troops cannot move behind the charging BG due to the presence of the friendly BG in contact with enemy.
So:
If it is impossible to shift friends back sufficiently to make room, the shock troops do not move at all and (if steady) drop to disrupted.
page 51, third bullet
Oh good spot.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:13 am
by gozerius
Which brings up the question: Since the BG did not move can it then move in the maneuver phase?

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:45 am
by ravenflight
gozerius wrote:Which brings up the question: Since the BG did not move can it then move in the maneuver phase?

I would say yes. In essence it has failed a compulsory 'attempt to not charge', and in doing so, as it CANNOT charge has dropped to disrupted, but is also free to move.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:47 am
by dave_r
gozerius wrote:Which brings up the question: Since the BG did not move can it then move in the maneuver phase?
No - because it has charged.

The wording on pg 76 defines what actions mean you can't make a manoever. Simply moving isn't one of them - if however you have charged then you can't make a manoever. In this case, you have charged, you simply haven't moved.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 1:44 am
by gozerius
But the BG has not charged. Its charge was blocked and is cancelled.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 6:42 am
by petedalby
I think you can read it either way.

But on Page 51 it clearly says the shock troops do not move at all having failed their test not to charge and being prevented from doing so. Now you could argue that refers just to the Impact phase or you can take it at face value.

And on Page 64 it clearly says that shock troops who successfully test not to charge are free to move in the manoeuvre phase.

So I think I read it the same as Dave - they can't move.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 1:54 pm
by RobKhan
I agree with Dave - the disruption is due to the unsuccessful attempt to get at the enemy. If it has not charged why is it disrupted? It cannot perform a maneuver, because it is not under control as defined by the CMT result.
Robkhan

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 6:03 pm
by gozerius
Does this apply to other BGs that were blocked from performing a declared charge? I 've always played that a BG whose charge is cancelled due to intervening friends can still move in the maneuver phase.
I have understood "cancelled" to mean "is negated", ie. it never happened.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 12:03 pm
by petedalby
Does this apply to other BGs that were blocked from performing a declared charge? I 've always played that a BG whose charge is cancelled due to intervening friends can still move in the maneuver phase.
I have understood "cancelled" to mean "is negated", ie. it never happened.
Surely it depends upon the circumstances. If a BG can't charge due to intervening friends then it's free to move. But if it failed a test not to charge and can't do so due to intervening friends then it cannot move.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:41 pm
by gozerius
I don't see the difference. In both cases a charge was cancelled. Whether the charge was declared or involuntary, it should not make a difference.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 11:02 pm
by dave_r
gozerius wrote:I don't see the difference. In both cases a charge was cancelled. Whether the charge was declared or involuntary, it should not make a difference.
In one case the Charge was cancelled.

In the other case the charge was not cancelled, but the BG didn't move.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 11:31 pm
by ravenflight
dave_r wrote:
gozerius wrote:I don't see the difference. In both cases a charge was cancelled. Whether the charge was declared or involuntary, it should not make a difference.
In one case the Charge was cancelled.

In the other case the charge was not cancelled, but the BG didn't move.
I can see both sides of this story, but am edging toward Dave's interpretation, not because of rules, but because of 'realism'.

Re: Bursting Through or not

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 1:18 am
by gozerius
So what you are saying is that because the involuntary charger is prevented from moving due its inability to burst through the friendly BG in its path it cannot move in the maneuver phase, but a voluntary charger that cannot move because of, presumably, subsequently intervening friendly troops can move in the maneuver phase. The difference being that the involuntary charge is a compulsory move.