Commander/General Selection
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:44 pm
Hi All,
I've just got it to FOG in the last few months, I've started to play some multiplayer DAG battles and i'm having a lot of fun but one thing that I'm having problems with is the selection of my leaders.
I've been playing 400 or 500 point army games as I find anything larger a bit overwhelming at the moment, not to mention the fact that it gives me to much choice at army selection and I'm as indecisive as they come which leads me to my main question. For 400 - 500 point games is it worth taking an inspirational commander? I have always used one so far as i like to try and win the initiative for map selection as I like to play with Hoplite armies and want a flat battlefield. I then usually have a field and a troop commander too, however, it is a lot of points to spend on commanders so I'm wondering if I should reconsider and take more troops?
Are the disadvantages of being out of command that great that it should always be avoided?
I've just got it to FOG in the last few months, I've started to play some multiplayer DAG battles and i'm having a lot of fun but one thing that I'm having problems with is the selection of my leaders.
I've been playing 400 or 500 point army games as I find anything larger a bit overwhelming at the moment, not to mention the fact that it gives me to much choice at army selection and I'm as indecisive as they come which leads me to my main question. For 400 - 500 point games is it worth taking an inspirational commander? I have always used one so far as i like to try and win the initiative for map selection as I like to play with Hoplite armies and want a flat battlefield. I then usually have a field and a troop commander too, however, it is a lot of points to spend on commanders so I'm wondering if I should reconsider and take more troops?
Are the disadvantages of being out of command that great that it should always be avoided?