Page 1 of 1

Question about flank charges on a pikes BG

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:25 am
by ecnomus
Hi, that is the question,

We have a 8 bases BG of macedonic pikes, with a 2 bases width front and 4 bases deep. We suppose this BG is in frontal close combat with other enemy group.

Then a third BG makes a flank charge on the third base of one of his flanks. This charging BG impacts only this base of the group, the third one if one of the two files of the group.

Well, the question is, how many bases must i turn to face the flank charge? Is this conformation possible if only one base must turn to face the new enemies?

Thanks in advance,
Carlos.

Re: Question about flank charges on a pikes BG

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:38 am
by rbodleyscott
ecnomus wrote:Hi, that is the question,

We have a 8 bases BG of macedonic pikes, with a 2 bases width front and 4 bases deep. We suppose this BG is in frontal close combat with other enemy group.

Then a third BG makes a flank charge on the third base of one of his flanks. This charging BG impacts only this base of the group, the third one if one of the two files of the group.

Well, the question is, how many bases must i turn to face the flank charge? Is this conformation possible if only one base must turn to face the new enemies?

Thanks in advance,
Carlos.
The 3rd base turns 90 degrees as per the normal 90 degree turn rules. This means that the 4th base also turns, ending up behind the 3rd. So there will still only be one base in contact.

The 1st and 2nd bases are now only 2 ranks deep, so that file will lose both its Pikemen POAs.

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:45 am
by terrys
The rule states:
Bases contacted on a side or rear edge, or a
rear corner, by an enemy flank or rear charge
are immediately turned 90 or 180 degrees
to face the chargers, using the normal rules
for turning, provided that they are not
already in contact with enemy to their front.
Both the 3rd and 4th bases turn to face the flank charge - 2 deep. (normal rules for turning 2 bases who's depth is 40mm or less)

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:53 am
by ecnomus
Thank you very much for your responses.

Carlos.