Austrian Grenze
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 12:03 pm
Lists have them as poor drilled light infantry or average irregular skirmishers, later lists only the irregular option.
Can I ask on what evidence this classification is based?
Of the 17 Regiments, 1 - 14 were 'regular' and the other 3 classified as 'irregular'.
1805 the Grenze had domestic political issues with the State, so Poor is a fair reflections for that period. Also only a fraction of the paper strength formed part of the field army.
1809 they had no similar gripes and performed as well as any other regular Austrian infantry, so far as my reading of Gill's trilogy would suggest. The 3 irregular regiment were with VII Corps in Poland. So Haupt Armee and Army of Inner Austria should have only regular Grenze units
1812 Campaign the Austrians did their best to be there without doing anything too useful - but that's generally the problem with Austrians - slow and a lack of any real aggression
1813 + Probably no different that the 1809/12 period - but my sources are more limited.
Ta
Can I ask on what evidence this classification is based?
Of the 17 Regiments, 1 - 14 were 'regular' and the other 3 classified as 'irregular'.
1805 the Grenze had domestic political issues with the State, so Poor is a fair reflections for that period. Also only a fraction of the paper strength formed part of the field army.
1809 they had no similar gripes and performed as well as any other regular Austrian infantry, so far as my reading of Gill's trilogy would suggest. The 3 irregular regiment were with VII Corps in Poland. So Haupt Armee and Army of Inner Austria should have only regular Grenze units
1812 Campaign the Austrians did their best to be there without doing anything too useful - but that's generally the problem with Austrians - slow and a lack of any real aggression
1813 + Probably no different that the 1809/12 period - but my sources are more limited.
Ta