Page 1 of 1
Did Hoplites Just Wear What they Wanted?
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 2:51 pm
by Eques
Leaving aside the Spartans is there any evidence that hoplites fought in companies, demarcated by colours or other distinguishing features, perhaps linked to a particular neighbourhood or fraternity? I know they were citizen soldiers but thought they still might have grouped themselves together voluntarily somehow.
Re: Did Hoplites Just Wear What they Wanted?
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:00 am
by ravenflight
Eques wrote:Leaving aside the Spartans is there any evidence that hoplites fought in companies, demarcated by colours or other distinguishing features, perhaps linked to a particular neighbourhood or fraternity? I know they were citizen soldiers but thought they still might have grouped themselves together voluntarily somehow.
From my understanding they would provide their own armour and equipment, so it would be a helmet, shield and spear. That makes them a hoplite. Decisions to wear armour etc was individual. Indeed, probably wearing a helmet was as well.
There were SOME city state hoplites (Syracuse for example) and they would probably be more regimented.
Generally, I think they wore the days clothing and whatever they bought, hence the diversified panopoly.
Re: Did Hoplites Just Wear What they Wanted?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:05 am
by grahambriggs
In terms of clothing, it would have been up to the individual. The helmets varied geographically; for example Corinth gave rise to the Corinthian style. Shield designs were sometime individual choice, sometimes city states all had the same. I imagine individual choice allowed your heroic deeds to be recognised, while having the same shield as your mates might avoid the ancient equivalent of "friendly fire" mistakes.
A good website is
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/luke/ueda-sarson ... rns_1.html
Re: Did Hoplites Just Wear What they Wanted?
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 12:14 pm
by Eques
Thanks