Page 1 of 1

v.2 changes

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:26 am
by martinvantol
Just got the v.2 rules yesterday, but haven't been in touch with the changes debate.
Is there a place where I can see a summary of the changes between v.1 and v.2 ?

Many thanks
Martin

Re: v.2 changes

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:12 am
by ShrubMiK
www.fieldofglory.com

Go to "News"

Currently the last item on page 2 : [12 Jul 2012] More details on FoG V2.0

Re: v.2 changes

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:01 am
by martinvantol
Found it. Thank you.

Re: v.2 changes

Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 1:26 pm
by dugroz
I was looking for this too, and it took a long time to find it. Is there any way the moderators can "sticky" it, or anything? I would paste a link if I could, but since it's embedded it doesn't have it's own url.

BTW, now you have to go to the 3rd page on "News," and as time goes by and more news is added it will get more and more buried. --[12 Jul 2012] More details on FoG V2.0

Re: v.2 changes

Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 2:03 pm
by philqw78
The bloke that runs that site is bloody rubbish. But pay peanuts and you get minkeys

Re: v.2 changes

Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 7:33 pm
by titanu
philqw78 wrote:The bloke that runs that site is bloody rubbish. But pay peanuts and you get minkeys
Aren't they whales?

Re: v.2 changes

Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 8:18 pm
by philqw78
No, I think he's French

Re: v.2 changes

Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 8:52 pm
by philqw78
But he's obviously not that bad as he has put this on the front page now. Obviously trying to ingratiate himself with the English since he's put up all the FoG R rankings as well

Re: v.2 changes

Posted: Thu May 09, 2013 10:22 pm
by dave_r
philqw78 wrote:But he's obviously not that bad as he has put this on the front page now. Obviously trying to ingratiate himself with the English since he's put up all the FoG R rankings as well
Nope, I still think he's a twit.

Re: v.2 changes

Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 8:01 am
by philqw78
Did you spell that wrong Dave?

Re: v.2 changes

Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 8:17 am
by dave_r
philqw78 wrote:Did you spell that wrong Dave?
Its a distinct possibility.