Page 1 of 1
"Directly away"
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 8:03 am
by KendallB
In today's game an intercepting shock heavy cavalry charged another shock heavy. The angle was almost perpendicular between the two units,
After combat, the interceping heavies were routed. The question that came up was What does "directly away from enemy" mean? Can the cavalry go back the way they came or do they have to go directly away from the enemy unit front edge?
Re: "Directly away"
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 8:05 pm
by deadtorius
I have always taken its as the enemy units front edge. Also means the pursuit has to start to the pursuers front.
Re: "Directly away"
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 7:02 pm
by viperofmilan
If I understand the situation correctly, We usually would rule that the intercepting unit would go back th way it had come.
Kevin
Re: "Directly away"
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:35 am
by deadtorius
My interpretation is that both units fight and when one breaks you move away from the winners front directly back. Regardless of intercept or charge.
In the case of breaking against multiple enemies you split the angle between the enemies and that is your rout direction, so its based on the front facing of the enemy. Similar would apply to a single enemy, you would use its front to determine the enemies rout path.
Perhaps Terry needs to give us a firm answer.
Re: "Directly away"
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:37 am
by terrys
You should use the direction of the enemy facing to determine the 'directly away' direction.
Re: "Directly away"
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:17 am
by deadtorius
perhaps adding "directly away from enemies front" to the errata would make it more clear.
Re: "Directly away"
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:26 pm
by hazelbark
bump this as a reminder if you are updating FAQ or Errata.
Re: "Directly away"
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:49 am
by terrys
I have added it to the new errata
Re: "Directly away"
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 5:42 pm
by hazelbark
Gracias Jeffe