While we wait for Unity and Wolves ...
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 12:17 am
Was just reading some old posts where players were discussing whether flank charges should be as devastating as rear charges, and i recalled this pretty cool website loaded with goodies
http://www.garyb.0catch.com/site_map.html
(specifically the article on the right titled "cavalry charging infantry")
Gives a pretty good argument ( with pictures and math as backup!) that flank charges wernt particulary useful ( at least against a Roman army)
I then recalled a really nice website that I believe old_warrior orginally posted a link to, but was lost when Slitherine was having those server crashes and entire threads were lost.
http://www.classicalfencing.com/articles/shock.php
The above gives a nice look at cavalry shock combat and explains how it was the saddle and the size and strength of the HUMAN that mattered and not stirrups or the mass of the horse. My favourite line " its better to face ( in lancer to lancer shock combat) a small man on a big horse than a big man on a small horse"
Good reads , especially with beer.
http://www.garyb.0catch.com/site_map.html
(specifically the article on the right titled "cavalry charging infantry")
Gives a pretty good argument ( with pictures and math as backup!) that flank charges wernt particulary useful ( at least against a Roman army)
I then recalled a really nice website that I believe old_warrior orginally posted a link to, but was lost when Slitherine was having those server crashes and entire threads were lost.
http://www.classicalfencing.com/articles/shock.php
The above gives a nice look at cavalry shock combat and explains how it was the saddle and the size and strength of the HUMAN that mattered and not stirrups or the mass of the horse. My favourite line " its better to face ( in lancer to lancer shock combat) a small man on a big horse than a big man on a small horse"
Good reads , especially with beer.