Goldap and Pelleninkin
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:56 am
To get the basics out of the way I play on FM level and ALWAYS use an imported corp.
Goldap: Holy Crap!!! INTENSE!!! Don't change a thing. I was panicking from start to finish. I think I spent more time trying to ensure that some of my favourite units survived than foccusing on winning the scenario. Overwhelming air and the ground units are everywhere and such dominant units! I reiterate; PLEASE, don't change a thing.
Pelleninkin: Your briefing suggested a lightning strike followed by a "fighting withdrawal!" 'Tis to laugh. It's more like running for your life! The only use use I got from my air units was defensive as well! I achieved a minor victory...barely, but in doing so I raped my army of most of it's offensive power and I fear for the future. I'm not totally convinced that a DV is possible in this scenario at the FM level, at least not with the core of units I lean towards, and that have served me well up until now. Having said all of that, I would again plead that you not change a thing. On reflection, one change I personally would like to have seen would be to up the core units one can start both of the above scenarios with, but other than that it's perfect.
Parck: Just about to start the scenario and upon reading the briefing I note that the following: "...blowing up a SERIOUS of bridges..." I believe "SERIES of bridges" was the intended phrase. Got to go now and see if I can get through Parck with anything left!
Goldap: Holy Crap!!! INTENSE!!! Don't change a thing. I was panicking from start to finish. I think I spent more time trying to ensure that some of my favourite units survived than foccusing on winning the scenario. Overwhelming air and the ground units are everywhere and such dominant units! I reiterate; PLEASE, don't change a thing.
Pelleninkin: Your briefing suggested a lightning strike followed by a "fighting withdrawal!" 'Tis to laugh. It's more like running for your life! The only use use I got from my air units was defensive as well! I achieved a minor victory...barely, but in doing so I raped my army of most of it's offensive power and I fear for the future. I'm not totally convinced that a DV is possible in this scenario at the FM level, at least not with the core of units I lean towards, and that have served me well up until now. Having said all of that, I would again plead that you not change a thing. On reflection, one change I personally would like to have seen would be to up the core units one can start both of the above scenarios with, but other than that it's perfect.
Parck: Just about to start the scenario and upon reading the briefing I note that the following: "...blowing up a SERIOUS of bridges..." I believe "SERIES of bridges" was the intended phrase. Got to go now and see if I can get through Parck with anything left!
