Page 1 of 1

Cavalry Attachment

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:12 pm
by Scrumpy
Does the cavalry within 6" rule applied to shooting dice count if the cavalry are an attachment, and do you measure the 6" range from the cavalry base, or the unit it is attached to in general ?

Re: Cavalry Attachment

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:59 pm
by hazelbark
I would think yes and from the unit.

Re: Cavalry Attachment

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:11 pm
by Blathergut
This was the only benefit (as far as I can tell in the rules) for a cavalry attachment: to drive off enemy skirmishers. I would assume since they are not in any one spot particularly, that you would measure from the front of the unit.

Re: Cavalry Attachment

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:09 pm
by mellis1644
The rules states the criteria that this applies on page 50. So the attachment only counts IF the attachment is any of the targeted units (even if assigned no dice is how I read it). Otherwise it does not count for this POA.

Re: Cavalry Attachment

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:06 am
by KendallB
The cavalry attachment only reduces skirmishing fire coming in to the unit that has the attachment. Only cavalry UNITS can reduced skirmishing fire in a 6" radius.

Re: Cavalry Attachment

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:57 am
by hazelbark
KendallB wrote:The cavalry attachment only reduces skirmishing fire coming in to the unit that has the attachment. Only cavalry UNITS can reduced skirmishing fire in a 6" radius.
Yes but for clarification. If an infantry unit with attachment is even partially the target then the shooter loses the dice.

So where C is a unit that has a cavalry attachment. Both 1 and 2 are effected by the reduction. 3 even withint 6 MU is not as it is not shooting at a unit even partially with a cavalry attachment.
1 __A
1__C
2__C
2__D
3__D
3

Re: Cavalry Attachment

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 4:08 am
by BrettPT
You are correct hazelbark.

Re: Cavalry Attachment

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:23 am
by Scrumpy
BrettPT wrote:You are correct hazelbark.

We try not to use those words over here in the former colonies, it only encourages the lad.

Re: Cavalry Attachment

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:03 am
by david53
Scrumpy wrote:
BrettPT wrote:You are correct hazelbark.

We try not to use those words over here in the former colonies, it only encourages the lad.

He'll end up like Mr Ruddock :)