Page 1 of 1

Disrupted LS cavalry?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:59 pm
by hidde
This is what I can find in the rules:

REFUSING TO CHARGE
 Light foot need to pass a test to charge any enemy other than light foot.
 Light horse need to pass a test to charge any enemy other than skirmishers.
 Unless shock troops, disrupted troops need to pass a test to charge.
 A battle group that refuses to charge may not move or shoot that player turn.

Well, in all my time playing FOG I have never been able to get a disrupted LS cavalry to charge.
Remember a tight game against ericdoman1 and how one disrupted LS cav of mine refused to charge a fragmented MF in the rear...
that's just plain stupid :D
Anyhow, if the rules are as posted above surely at least one or two of my countless tries should have been successful?!

Re: Disrupted LS cavalry?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:18 pm
by TheGrayMouser
hidde wrote:This is what I can find in the rules:

REFUSING TO CHARGE
 Light foot need to pass a test to charge any enemy other than light foot.
 Light horse need to pass a test to charge any enemy other than skirmishers.
 Unless shock troops, disrupted troops need to pass a test to charge.
 A battle group that refuses to charge may not move or shoot that player turn.

Well, in all my time playing FOG I have never been able to get a disrupted LS cavalry to charge.
Remember a tight game against ericdoman1 and how one disrupted LS cav of mine refused to charge a fragmented MF in the rear...
that's just plain stupid :D
Anyhow, if the rules are as posted above surely at least one or two of my countless tries should have been successful?!
Remember that that disruption gives a negative modifier to pass the test to charge

Re: Disrupted LS cavalry?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:28 pm
by hidde
Yes, of course, but never once pass the test in 2,5 years of playing? :shock:
I can't be 100% sure of that but I know I have thought of this, on and off, for a very long time and I have no recollection of a successful test!

Re: Disrupted LS cavalry?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:30 pm
by TheGrayMouser
hidde wrote:Yes, of course, but never once pass the test in 2,5 years of playing? :shock:
I can't be 100% sure of that but I know I have thought of this, on and off, for a very long time and I have no recollection of a successful test!
They do pass, just saw it in a game, refused twice and then obeyed ( and routed at impact , guess he knew better than me lol)

An undrilled ls cavarly that is disorderd or disrupted would need to roll 7 or higher on 2 d6, or 6 out of 11, slightly better than 5050 chance.

Re: Disrupted LS cavalry?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:27 pm
by batesmotel
Disrupted undrilled would need 9 or higher. Disrupted drilled need 8 or higher so both less than 50/50.

Chris

Re: Disrupted LS cavalry?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:30 pm
by TheGrayMouser
batesmotel wrote:Disrupted undrilled would need 9 or higher. Disrupted drilled need 8 or higher so both less than 50/50.

Chris
OOps you of course are correct, did the math wrong (dont ask :oops: )

Re: Disrupted LS cavalry?

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:43 am
by hidde
Ok,thanks. At least I know it's worth trying.
Some lucky day it will happen to me too!

Re: Disrupted LS cavalry?

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:41 pm
by TheGrayMouser
hidde wrote:Ok,thanks. At least I know it's worth trying.
Some lucky day it will happen to me too!
Sometimes maybe they refuse for a reason lol. Just finshed a game where my roman superior disrupted LS refused twice to charge an enemy skirmisher. Third time he obeyed , the skirmisher held and my cavalry autorouted from casualty losses, doh...