Slitherine

Thought I would add a poll for this as no decision has yet been made. I suppose since it is 'The Worlds' everybody can vote, and I don't know if any votes will make any difference since the BHGS is some sort of self perpetuating nepotistic balkanized oligarchal theocracy run by Bruce and Hammy.

I voted for more points, same table size. To be sure I would be as happy with 800 points on the usual 6x4 table. I like that just fine.

Of course, since I cannot make the Worlds this year (see earlier post about my wife capturing that weekend) my opinions should be given the weight that they merit: immediate adoption by all concerned.

Marc

I should damn well hope the votes will make no difference - war gamers and democracy don't mix

Well 7 people want to do the same as they do every Britcon. 2 people want to show off their enormous assets. Eleven people want to put their smaller assetts somewhere they will look bigger and 3 people believe there assets should be kept in proportion with their environment.

But overwhelmingly at least 6 billion people haven't yet voted.

Part of the problem is you can't vote for more than one. I don't care as long the armies are at least 800 pts.

miverson wrote:Part of the problem is you can't vote for more than one.

Is that an American form of Democracy?

philqw78 wrote:

miverson wrote:Part of the problem is you can't vote for more than one.

Is that an American form of Democracy?

Single Transferable Vote is Irish isn't it?

philqw78 wrote:

miverson wrote:Part of the problem is you can't vote for more than one.

Is that an American form of Democracy?

No. If this were American democracy, you would be receiving six robo-calls a night telling you that people who favor 650-pt. lists are socialists who sacrifice babies to Satan.

miverson wrote:

philqw78 wrote:

miverson wrote:Part of the problem is you can't vote for more than one.

Is that an American form of Democracy?

No. If this were American democracy, you would be receiving six robo-calls a night telling you that people who favor 650-pt. lists are socialists who sacrifice babies to Satan.

It's true! I heard it on talk radio.

Marc

It is true, but being reminded about it every night is unnecessary and annoying.

Well, more than 50% of people want smaller tables and nearly 10% will do anything for a beer. What more evidence do you need.

That makes sense. As beer consumption proceeds and the players expand, , they cannot stand as close, and eventually can't reach across a full size table.

philqw78 wrote:Well, more than 50% of people want smaller tables and nearly 10% will do anything for a beer. What more evidence do you need.

Phil

how did you manage to vote twice

Voters have no power. The people that count the votes have the power.

I have now voted 3 times for too drunk too care but it seems many more people want smaller tables than beer. I shall poke this in the face of the BHGS. Along with the threat of staying sober for a tournament if they don't listen to the people. (Or at least those that could be arsed to vote.)

miverson wrote:It is true, but being reminded about it every night is unnecessary and annoying.

but it finances some of our gaming habits.