Page 1 of 1
Which is better for an AT gun?
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:13 pm
by jonpfl
All,
Should I hide him in a forest or let him sit in an open field to force the tank to attack me from a river?
Which is a better scenario?
Thx
jonpfl
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:09 pm
by billmv44
I think it depends on the type of gun. If it's towed and is in reach of enemy artillery, then I'd rather not have it in the open. But for an SP gun, behind the river is my preference.
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:10 pm
by jonpfl
billmv44 wrote:I think it depends on the type of gun. If it's towed and is in reach of enemy artillery, then I'd rather not have it in the open. But for an SP gun, behind the river is my preference.
If he attacks me from a river/bridge space, he is going to incur a -4 attack penalty, right?
Thx
jonpfl
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:05 am
by CrimsonStorm
Kind of...you get a +4 defence and a +4 attack bonus. He doesn't suffer any actual penalty. At leats thats how I recall it working last time I looked at the projection.
The other thing to consider aside from entrenchment is initiative capping...which is something I'm yet to figure out I'll admit