Slitherine

Regaring to the list which Max wrote in page 24 of last AAR , I have to clear as follows :
1 The password bug was found before I opened Max turn . I just want to confirm whether this bug also effect our AAR , If not I would continue the AAR & just report the bug to the team , If it effect our AAR , I think the AAR will have to be halt .
2 I sent four emails to push him to play the double Allies-Axis game ,Because this is his proposal & it seems welcome in the forum & the game will be useful to test the 2.01.33 patch . He explained he had too many game to play ,but I maybe misunderstood he is barginning for me to continue the present AAR , so I suugest I declare he is winner of the AAR & we can continue . I just do not want to make the audience disappointed & do something useful to test the new patch for the team .
3 I never thought I am more important than the game .How is this point come from ?
4 No one told me what is the spirit of this game . If there is ,please advise me sothat I can obey . but It is not the first time I am beta tester , As I know that one of the resoponsibility of the beta tester is the exploit the game engine to find the weakness ,sothat the game team can fix it .Am I wrong ?
5 Yes I post part of our email content on the forum , The only reason is my limited English . I think the part is the same as I want to say on the forum,so I just copy & paste it .
I think the above points have nothing to do with my gamestyle & my behave ,I don’t mind I will be on whose list of what . One point which you are quite right “it is only a game !”

@ Morris

The last AAR was one of the most enjoyable and this can be seen by the number of views that this recieved.

I do have some simpathy for your position - I do not believe there is any cheating or foul play at hand here - rather there is publicly posted comments which should be between Max and yourself.

I dont think despite the allegations that you are a bad person to play against and I think that this is something which should be privatly held comments.

There are a number of changes which will benefit the game as a whole which has come from your play. This has benefited the game in general.

I recently played a very frustrating game versus an opponant where I was Axis - I had a fairly normal start, accepting the French armistace - I defended in North Africa heavily with the Luftwaffe and this sucked his UK PP (along with a strong Italian Navy) - in Russia I ran full steam ahead suffered some reverses and then defended in winter outside the severe weather zone. My opponant used an almost exclusivly Mech blob against me, I learnt from the forums about the blobs and developed my own defence which resulted in the fact that in 44 when my opponant stopped playing - Finland had surrenderd but I still held Odessa, Sevastepol and the baltic countries. My manpower was around 90%, oil was 150 and Italy was still fully committed to the war. I would not have been as succesfull if not for seeing some of your tactics - I may have gotten steam rollered as most of your early opponents where.

So from my side when 2.1 is officially released I would be more than happy to play anyone. I love the game - in fact I think about it way to often than is healthy.

The only sad part about most of the AAR's is that they dont go to completion (baring a few exclusions). That said I dont have the time, inclination of ability to post an entertaining AAR so anything posted is gratefully recieved.

afk_nero wrote:@ Morris

The last AAR was one of the most enjoyable and this can be seen by the number of views that this recieved.

I do have some simpathy for your position - I do not believe there is any cheating or foul play at hand here - rather there is publicly posted comments which should be between Max and yourself.

I dont think despite the allegations that you are a bad person to play against and I think that this is something which should be privatly held comments.

There are a number of changes which will benefit the game as a whole which has come from your play. This has benefited the game in general.

I recently played a very frustrating game versus an opponant where I was Axis - I had a fairly normal start, accepting the French armistace - I defended in North Africa heavily with the Luftwaffe and this sucked his UK PP (along with a strong Italian Navy) - in Russia I ran full steam ahead suffered some reverses and then defended in winter outside the severe weather zone. My opponant used an almost exclusivly Mech blob against me, I learnt from the forums about the blobs and developed my own defence which resulted in the fact that in 44 when my opponant stopped playing - Finland had surrenderd but I still held Odessa, Sevastepol and the baltic countries. My manpower was around 90%, oil was 150 and Italy was still fully committed to the war. I would not have been as succesfull if not for seeing some of your tactics - I may have gotten steam rollered as most of your early opponents where.

So from my side when 2.1 is officially released I would be more than happy to play anyone. I love the game - in fact I think about it way to often than is healthy.

The only sad part about most of the AAR's is that they dont go to completion (baring a few exclusions). That said I dont have the time, inclination of ability to post an entertaining AAR so anything posted is gratefully recieved.

Thanks for your attention ! BTW , Your situation in 1944 was much better than the Axis in the last AAR with Max . I do ignore the one who halt the game because he does not want to lose . Let's lookforward to the 2.1 's coming .