Skipping 1939 on to 1940
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:27 pm
I played the first scenario from the 1940 campaign by starting fresh in to 1940. That is to say I did not run through 1939 and then continued in to 1940 from there. I’m sure that playing from 1939 and lead in to 1940 would give different results, because by then you should have a fairly well developed core force.
But the point of having multiple campaigns is so you can start from that point and move forward.
I played it twice on the default level and found it a bit challenging. First time a loss (buying more artillery and tanks) and using a straight on tactic. The second time a marginal victory (purchasing pioneires to handle all the bunkers) and using a more of a flanking tactic. You do not start off with very many units and can only purchase 3 more. True the opening briefing does mention that Pioneires are needed, but who wants a core force of nothing but pioneires? After all the game is call “Panzer” Corps, not “Pioneires” Corps.
Don’t’ get me wrong though; I personally enjoyed the challenge, but a newer player might find starting in 1940 a bit on the frustrating side.
But the point of having multiple campaigns is so you can start from that point and move forward.
I played it twice on the default level and found it a bit challenging. First time a loss (buying more artillery and tanks) and using a straight on tactic. The second time a marginal victory (purchasing pioneires to handle all the bunkers) and using a more of a flanking tactic. You do not start off with very many units and can only purchase 3 more. True the opening briefing does mention that Pioneires are needed, but who wants a core force of nothing but pioneires? After all the game is call “Panzer” Corps, not “Pioneires” Corps.
Don’t’ get me wrong though; I personally enjoyed the challenge, but a newer player might find starting in 1940 a bit on the frustrating side.
