Pursuing from field fortifications and warriors overlapping
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:40 am
I played a game yesterday where I was defending field fortifications. Two of my BGs routed my opponent's two BGs. I didn't pursue as we assumed troops defending didn't have to (not that it would have mattered anyway as it was the last turn) but I was looking for something else in the rules and came across the pursuit section and it seems that defenders have to pursue. Is this correct? Or have I missed an exception to p. 131?
Also my opponent had warriors armed with bow only. Warriors overlapping get an automatic ++ even without a melee weapon - is this correct? He was using Japanese so it would seem that running a late version with medium foot instead of warriors make them less effective as overlaps in combat even though they have the same weapons.
Both of these seem a bit odd to me.
Also my opponent had warriors armed with bow only. Warriors overlapping get an automatic ++ even without a melee weapon - is this correct? He was using Japanese so it would seem that running a late version with medium foot instead of warriors make them less effective as overlaps in combat even though they have the same weapons.
Both of these seem a bit odd to me.