Slitherine

I'll add all the error written below:

37mm wz.36 - ATG has AA animation

85mm M1939 - vs ground no fire effect

German "Schnellboot" (Torpedoboat" in Norway has no moving sound

TP7 - has original PG move sound

Renault R35 - No fire effect and move sound

25mm CAmle 39 - vs ground no fire effect

Panzer IA - incorrect fire animation at shooting to the left side

[img][img]http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/527/panzeria.png[/img]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

German "Schnellboot" (Torpedoboat" in Norway has no moving sound


By the way a cool unit i hope you implement it in all Maps with naval parts

They're in Hunters in the Atlantic, has been for a while now.
Also got added in to The Frozen North recently.
A couple of them are in Norway too!

I'm not sure if this is a bug or how it is supposed to work:
2 3.7" AD units and a Stuka attacks a ground unit within 3 hexes of each (range 3) but neither fires defensive AD fire. On my turn they are able to fire offensively. Is that how it's intended to work? If so, it's totally foreign to PG2.

85mm M1939 - vs ground no fire effect

SU-122 mobile Art never returns fire at units 3 hexes away.

Razz1 wrote:SU-122 mobile Art never returns fire at units 3 hexes away.

Artillery not returned fire on more than one field, support the unit to next hex, shoot the 2 fields.

So, ART and AD give defensive support fire to adjacent units but can only fire 2 or 3 hexes in attack? Is that how it works?

El_Condoro wrote:So, ART and AD give defensive support fire to adjacent units but can only fire 2 or 3 hexes in attack? Is that how it works?

Correct.

No combat animation for Ju-87B.

You mean when it attacks ground targets? Because that would be intended, there's only a sound effect of bomber diving. And of course the explosion if it hits something. It's the same for all bombers.

French H35 and H39. Absolutely Identical stats (I even compare them in the pzequip file).

457 Hotchkiss H35 1 112 10 38 5 2 0 4 4 4 0 1 10 9 1 1 4 01.01.1939 01.01.1944 0 rott
458 Hotchkiss H39 1 127 10 38 5 2 0 4 4 4 0 1 10 9 1 1 4 01.01.1939 01.01.1944 0 rott


YET the H39 costs 127, the H35 only 112. I do agree that having multiple units especially historical ones makes the game more flavorable and allows the players to "customize" their forces. But having two units with identical stats will only cause the players to buy H35s.

At least make them identically priced....or change fuel/ammo something.

Iscaran wrote:French H35 and H39. Absolutely Identical stats (I even compare them in the pzequip file).

457 Hotchkiss H35 1 112 10 38 5 2 0 4 4 4 0 1 10 9 1 1 4 01.01.1939 01.01.1944 0 rott
458 Hotchkiss H39 1 127 10 38 5 2 0 4 4 4 0 1 10 9 1 1 4 01.01.1939 01.01.1944 0 rott


YET the H39 costs 127, the H35 only 112. I do agree that having multiple units especially historical ones makes the game more flavorable and allows the players to "customize" their forces. But having two units with identical stats will only cause the players to buy H35s.

At least make them identically priced....or change fuel/ammo something.

Yea, there seems to be an R35 and an H35. The R35 looks like it has the right stats, cheaper, slower, weaker HA, less initative, but the H35 doesn't.

You mean when it attacks ground targets? Because that would be intended, there's only a sound effect of bomber diving. And of course the explosion if it hits something. It's the same for all bombers.

Hmm, I'll have to go back and check. I think there were no animations when the Ju-87 was attacked and took damage (no explosions on the aircraft itself), but I'll double check to be sure.

There is also an R35 (Renault tank) and the Somua S35 as well.

They are all different tanks.

The official designation of the "H39" was actually Char léger Hotchkiss modèle 38 série D or also refered to as Char léger modèle 1935 H modifié 39 or "H39". The Hotchkiss tanks basically are all based on the H35 model, with modifications done later they are sometimes called H38, H39 or H40.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotchkiss_H35

The major difference between H35 and H39, both based on the very same design, were only minor changes to traction and motorization/speed/movement parts which allowed the H39's to be more maneuverable and roughly 10kph faster and also from 1940 on some tanks were als upgraded by a slightly better gun and radios for better tank-tank communication.

Therefore I think some differences in stats should represent this....or remove either one of the models completely.