Slitherine

I was wondering how this will be handled as in sc1 and sc2 you have to take rome, while in world at war you have to take 3 of 4 spots to get itally to give up.

Was wonderingh how this will be handled as i find in the sc's that no one goes for italy as a first option to drain the german front on the east.

mrdozer wrote:I was wondering how this will be handled as in sc1 and sc2 you have to take rome, while in world at war you have to take 3 of 4 spots to get itally to give up.

Was wonderingh how this will be handled as i find in the sc's that no one goes for italy as a first option to drain the german front on the east.

Countries surrende when all Capitals are conquered and countries can have several capitals.

Currenly only UK and USSR have multiple capitals so that means as of current Rome is sufficient for Italian surrender.

thats my concern. I understand why Italy has Rome but i see it as a deterent to even attack it. I will have to see how the game plays out but i hope you keep it as a consideration as a historic evemt kinda thing.

I can assure you that Italy does not surrender if you capture Genoa in 1940!!

I can assure you that Italy does not surrender if you capture Genoa in 1940!!

But maybe it should;^)

can't win without taking Italy. That is incentive.

yes you need italy but every game i have played of sc people always leave it to last.

mrdozer wrote:yes you need italy but every game i have played of sc people always leave it to last.

Well, I have different experiences. When you play against good SC2 player Italy, in most cases, came first because of only one capital and money plunder. In occupied France good Axis player builds Atlantic Wall and when Allies liberate Paris they don??™t get money so Italy is most profitable.