Duty and Glory Errata
Posted: Sat May 28, 2011 6:32 am
Amazon UK having finally delivered D&G, I have been reading through it twice this past 2 weeks or so. At this point I would usually be opening up the errata thread and listing all the errors I have found and complaints I have about the lists.
This time (other than the slight 1683 Siege of Vienna oddities at 800 points already noted) I can't find a single mistake despite reading all the lists twice. I don't always agree with all the interps but not really my period. Certainly none of the lists are that far off that I can make a case for an errata. The armies are interesting but look generally balanced - Post 1675 Danish is not the army of choice as it might be in other rules. It has got me rebasing figures that have sat for years as I want to try these armies.
FoG:R team take a bow, the best book of any part of FoG. It will take something to top this.
If anyone does find an errata requirement, post it here.
This time (other than the slight 1683 Siege of Vienna oddities at 800 points already noted) I can't find a single mistake despite reading all the lists twice. I don't always agree with all the interps but not really my period. Certainly none of the lists are that far off that I can make a case for an errata. The armies are interesting but look generally balanced - Post 1675 Danish is not the army of choice as it might be in other rules. It has got me rebasing figures that have sat for years as I want to try these armies.
FoG:R team take a bow, the best book of any part of FoG. It will take something to top this.
If anyone does find an errata requirement, post it here.