Henrician English - why so poor ?
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 8:37 am
Hi
I know its not going to change anything but why is this army so short of good troops -
1. Why arent they allowed superior lannsnecht - did nt henry pay enough ?
2. Why arent their reiters allowed lances - even heavy - they carried boar spears
which were one assumes designed to pierce armour - reference george gush
Also these are the WORST reiter u can have - only pistol on shooting !!
3. No heavy artillery - what about the 12 apostles he dragged across northern france
4. Why are the gentlemen pensioner gendarmes only average - there are only 2 of them
and if they represemt the knights who charged at pinkie into scottish pike blocks -
the bulleners - surely they deserve better ratings.
No point - i will only use early henrician as later is hopeless=- just interested
Steve
I know its not going to change anything but why is this army so short of good troops -
1. Why arent they allowed superior lannsnecht - did nt henry pay enough ?
2. Why arent their reiters allowed lances - even heavy - they carried boar spears
which were one assumes designed to pierce armour - reference george gush
Also these are the WORST reiter u can have - only pistol on shooting !!
3. No heavy artillery - what about the 12 apostles he dragged across northern france
4. Why are the gentlemen pensioner gendarmes only average - there are only 2 of them
and if they represemt the knights who charged at pinkie into scottish pike blocks -
the bulleners - surely they deserve better ratings.
No point - i will only use early henrician as later is hopeless=- just interested
Steve