Stauffenberg wrote:My first attention was the Norway scenario since I'm a Norwegian. Here I found several spelling errors on the towns. The map doesn't look much like southern Norway either, but that's probably harder to fix.
Town errors:
Correct spelling (wrong spelling currently in PC):
Fredrikstad (Fredrikstadt)
Kongsvinger (Kongstinger)
Voss (Vossevangen). Most people just call this town for Voss even though the town centre is called Vossevangen by locals. On most maps you just see Voss.
Roros (Rores). Correct spelling is actually Røros, but we type ø as o in English.
Honefoss (Hoenefoss). Correct spelling is Hønefoss, but you don't show Norwegian special letters. It's typical to just let ø be written as o and å as a (as you did with Dombås and Åndalsnes). Sometimes ø is written as oe, but it's more common to remove the e. Hoenefoss is possible too, but then Dombås should be Dombaas and Åndalsnes Aandalsnes.
Thank you for corrections. I have check it and it will be changed except maybe for Vossevangen. It looks to me this is a term in transition. So I would keep the name of locals.
http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vossevangen
http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voss
Stauffenberg wrote:Sola airfield near Stavanger. Stavanger and Sola should change places because Sola is actually located southwest of Stavanger.
It is true Sola is more to the south but Stavanger is located correctly. I didn't want to use 5,26 because it is too close to sea and 6,26 has road I didn't want to remove so it was placed where it is. But good idea to switch places.
Stauffenberg wrote:Airfield near Trondheim can be named Vaernes (Værnes).
Airfield near Oslo can be named Fornebu.
In most cases airfields do not have special name but for Sola it was easy available and because you kindly provided other names there is no reason not to include them.
Stauffenberg wrote:Hex 11,27 could be an airfield called Kjevik. Kristiansand had an airfield the Germans captured soon after the invasion begun.
After all I placed paratroopers there so I could place the airfield too although it is not so important from perspective of strategic placement of airfields but just to represent such airborne action more accurately.
Stauffenberg wrote:Danish airfields are probably the important airfields of Aalborg. Hirtshals is a small coastal town, but Aalborg is actually slightly offmap so I guess it can be used. Maybe airfields can be called Aalborg W and Aalborg E or something. Or left one can be called Hjorring and east one Fredrikshavn. Problem is that neither Hjorring nor Fredrikshavn had any airfields. The Aalborg aerodrome was the ones the Germans used. It was actually captured by paratroopers in April 9th 1940.
You noticed correctly that Hirtshals is here because Aalborg is of map. And two airfields are placed only to provide sufficient room for resupplying and replacement.
Stauffenberg wrote:There was a rail line between hex 16,17 and eastwards to Elverum. The hex 16, 17 should be a town called Hamar. It's the biggest town in the area and bigger than both Elverum and Lillehammer. Hamar was an important rail intersection. The left line to Trondheim (Gudbrandsdalsbanen) went via Lillehammer and Dombas and the right line (Rørosbanen) went via Elverum and Røros.
I was not aware of importance of Hamar but decision which cities to place in this case was done to get better composition of supply hexes.
Stauffenberg wrote:Larvik should be placed in hex 14,24 instead of 14,25. It's located slightly left of the mouth of the Oslo fjord.
Larvik is on border between 14,25 and 15,24 and Fredrikstad should be in 16,24. That way both cities would be adjacent to each other even if they are on opposite sides of bay. So one is moved little bit to left other little bit to right. and there are two sea hexes between them.
Stauffenberg wrote:Bergen should be in the hex 5,18 instead of 5,19.
My mistake but I always give myself tolerance of one hex.
Stauffenberg wrote:If you have coastal batteries as unit type could could consider adding Oscarsborg 1x S of Oslo. This coastal battery sunk the German heavy cruiser, Blücher, and routed several other German warships. This allowed the Norwegian King and Government to escape from Oslo.
Oscarsborg fortress is placed in consideration and when I look how much room for manoeuvring there is on the south I become desperate. Any force that tries to land there will suffer heavy casualties from the moment of being in naval transports to the moment of attacking the fort and there is no room for concealed movement. So presence of it will not result of making German warships at bay but preventing effective landing on that part of map and maybe causing choke point at Oslo. So it is mostly gameplay question.
Stauffenberg wrote:Rail line between Honefoss and Bergen and Lillehammer and Trondheim should be mostly forest, but maybe it's made clear to allow for faster unit movement?
Units can move fast on road at any terrain, but more to present it as some kind of valley.