Page 1 of 1

Bayonet armed troops

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:17 pm
by david53
Hi There

Checking my rules after a bit of a break into the ancient period, I've been looking at the Army List book Duty and Glory.

Late BGs of 5 musket armed troops with bayonet and 1 Pikeman. Now say they are charged by Mounted troops they would get a plus because of the Pike ie protected but nothing for the bayonet, unless the Pikeman is killed when the Bayonet factor comes in, is this correct?

Dave

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 8:21 pm
by Scrumpy
The Pikeman is rarely if ever killed, you would lose shot to any shooting casualties.

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 9:18 pm
by marshalney2000
I think it is impossible to lose the pike as you need to keep it to maintain the original ratios. The unit will auto break before the pike dies.
John

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 10:54 pm
by rbodleyscott
But as they pay nothing for the bayonet if they are in a BG with pike......

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 10:22 am
by MatteoPasi
The bayonette in pike supported unit apply only when units are figthing in 2 direction: on the side they lose the protection but stil have the bayonet
;)

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 10:55 am
by rbodleyscott
MatteoPasi wrote:The bayonette in pike supported unit apply only when units are figthing in 2 direction: on the side they lose the protection but stil have the bayonet
;)
Good point. They also get to use them if they are detached.

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:53 am
by MatteoPasi
rbodleyscott wrote:
MatteoPasi wrote:The bayonette in pike supported unit apply only when units are figthing in 2 direction: on the side they lose the protection but stil have the bayonet
;)
Good point. They also get to use them if they are detached.
And when they are in column formation with shot in the first line ;)

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:54 am
by petedalby
I think it is impossible to lose the pike as you need to keep it to maintain the original ratios.
But if the pike were fighting at impact against a single base frontage BG - and lost - and then lost a base - surely the pike base would be removed?

And then the bayonets look good value.

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 1:21 pm
by david53
petedalby wrote:
I think it is impossible to lose the pike as you need to keep it to maintain the original ratios.
But if the pike were fighting at impact against a single base frontage BG - and lost - and then lost a base - surely the pike base would be removed?

And then the bayonets look good value.
Thats what I was trying to get too, since I have a lot of 5 to 1 BGs seemed like a good question.

Just another thought same BG 5 Muskets/Bayonet and 1 Pike if its in melee and the one Pike base is armoured do you get 1 dice at plus against 5 dice at evens if the target was unarmoured?

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 7:06 pm
by madaxeman
david53 wrote:
petedalby wrote:
I think it is impossible to lose the pike as you need to keep it to maintain the original ratios.
But if the pike were fighting at impact against a single base frontage BG - and lost - and then lost a base - surely the pike base would be removed?

And then the bayonets look good value.
Thats what I was trying to get too, since I have a lot of 5 to 1 BGs seemed like a good question.

Just another thought same BG 5 Muskets/Bayonet and 1 Pike if its in melee and the one Pike base is armoured do you get 1 dice at plus against 5 dice at evens if the target was unarmoured?
I suspect your opponent would get 4 bases at 4's and 2 bases needing 5's as one file would be facing armoured pike.

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 7:30 am
by kevinj
Actually hitting the Pike base in a 1+5 Pike and Shot BG is going to be tricky as normally it will be in the rear rank, see P33.

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 7:49 am
by rbodleyscott
kevinj wrote:Actually hitting the Pike base in a 1+5 Pike and Shot BG is going to be tricky as normally it will be in the rear rank, see P33.
Except when it isn't - when charging or charged by mounted enemy it can (and needs to) automove into the front rank so that the files all count as Protected.

Sorry, I don't have the rules with me so I cannot quote the page number, but it is in the Impact Phase section on formation changes when charging/charged.

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 8:13 am
by kevinj
Thank you, yes that's on Page 75.

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 3:46 pm
by marshalney2000
I don't have my rules to hand either but I seem to recall the move to the front rank was optional. If the unit has bayonets why bother particularly if the opponent has better armour and a musketeer fights better than a pikemen.

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 4:37 pm
by rbodleyscott
marshalney2000 wrote:I don't have my rules to hand either but I seem to recall the move to the front rank was optional. If the unit has bayonets why bother particularly if the opponent has better armour and a musketeer fights better than a pikemen.
Mainly because Protected is a POA better than Bayonet vs Mounted.

(Protected cancels mounted POA and gives a POA vs mounted, Bayonet only cancels the mounted POA)