New Player First impressions
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:27 pm
A week after signing up (that felt like months??¦) I now have the rules to examine.
As requested ??“ first impressions ??¦
There is quite a lot trailed on the public board now, and nothing in the rules was really unexpected. I am slightly concerned about the long term playability ??“ there does not seem to be much scope for the subtle twiddling that makes DBM such a challenge.
I have to admit that the movement rules don??™t do anything for me ??“ you can move your units, and sometimes you can??™t move them how you want. A little too close to warhammer for my liking, but until I get an army out and play with it ??“ the movement rules are fairly meaningless.
The combat stuff is the bit I can do in my head, and I like it ??“ a lot. Pretty much all the interactions that I can think off feel about right when I tot up results(though I would like HYW longbows to be better than average). Toting up the results ??“ again a lot like warhammer ??“ I can work out success chances pretty quickly without having to resort to fingers ??“ which means I can be sad and geeky and work out fights in my head when I am supposed to be doing something more useful
Problems ??“ finding points values for foot ??“ I sort of assumed that LF and MF would be different points to HF - and couldn??™t find the points values (doh)
P40 there is a comment about everyone shooting at unprotected cav at ++, but this is not supported by the table.
P44 1 dice per 2 bases if 2nd shooting rank or outside effective range.
So a 2 by 4 block of bow at long range. Is that 4 dice (2 for 4 front rank, 2 for 4 rear rank) or 3 dice (2 for 4 front rand, 1 fro 4 rear rank)
Overlap ??“cant find how it comes into play. I think I may understand it, but im not sure and have been hunting through the pile of paper I now have in front of me for something definite.
As requested ??“ first impressions ??¦
There is quite a lot trailed on the public board now, and nothing in the rules was really unexpected. I am slightly concerned about the long term playability ??“ there does not seem to be much scope for the subtle twiddling that makes DBM such a challenge.
I have to admit that the movement rules don??™t do anything for me ??“ you can move your units, and sometimes you can??™t move them how you want. A little too close to warhammer for my liking, but until I get an army out and play with it ??“ the movement rules are fairly meaningless.
The combat stuff is the bit I can do in my head, and I like it ??“ a lot. Pretty much all the interactions that I can think off feel about right when I tot up results(though I would like HYW longbows to be better than average). Toting up the results ??“ again a lot like warhammer ??“ I can work out success chances pretty quickly without having to resort to fingers ??“ which means I can be sad and geeky and work out fights in my head when I am supposed to be doing something more useful
Problems ??“ finding points values for foot ??“ I sort of assumed that LF and MF would be different points to HF - and couldn??™t find the points values (doh)
P40 there is a comment about everyone shooting at unprotected cav at ++, but this is not supported by the table.
P44 1 dice per 2 bases if 2nd shooting rank or outside effective range.
So a 2 by 4 block of bow at long range. Is that 4 dice (2 for 4 front rank, 2 for 4 rear rank) or 3 dice (2 for 4 front rand, 1 fro 4 rear rank)
Overlap ??“cant find how it comes into play. I think I may understand it, but im not sure and have been hunting through the pile of paper I now have in front of me for something definite.