Slitherine

One possible 'issue' from the weekend, we have two different tests one called a CMT and one a CT. It was noticable that a lot of people were refering to CMT's as CT's and getting confused as to the effect of generals in each one.

Is there any reason that a CMT has to be named that way? Could it be renamed to be a Maneuver Test or some other name that doesn't get abreviated to CT.

I am sure we can think of something nmore distinctive. An MT why not? We'll kick it around. Any other suggestions welcome.

Si

shall wrote:I am sure we can think of something nmore distinctive. An MT why not? We'll kick it around. Any other suggestions welcome.

Si

Or DMT

(Difficult Manoeuvre Test)

Much better IMHO.

Si

rbodleyscott wrote:

shall wrote:I am sure we can think of something nmore distinctive. An MT why not? We'll kick it around. Any other suggestions welcome.

Si

Or DMT

(Difficult Manoeuvre Test)

I think MT works better - "complex" or for that matter "difficult" doesnt really add anything, as it is a test to do a maneuver .... Leaving in the extra word also maybes reinforces the first-impression that good units can do "complex/difficult" things, which lets face it, most wargamers equate with "cheating" !!

A good point - the less it looks complex or dodgy the better.

Si