Army Lists - Generals maxima and minima
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:06 pm
Generals updated in all lists.
Unless listed below, to:
C-in-C: IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
Exceptions
Classical Greek
Generals As cavalry or hoplites
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC
SGs: TC 0-2
Greek ally Generals As cavalry or hoplites TC 0-3
Harsh? Probably realistic, but what other armies should also be so affected?
At least it won??™t knobble them too much as having all SGs as TC is currently favoured as a cost-effective configuriation. (Unless we change the generals rules)
Classical Indian
Generals As elephants, chariots or cavalry.
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC/TC 0-2
Indian ally generals As elephants, chariots or cavalry. FC/TC 0-3
Hard to justify a compulsory AG e.g. in Mauryan empire
Alexandrian Macedonian
List notes:
If the C-in-C is Alexander he must be an IC.
Hellenistic Greek
Generals As light horse if Aitolian, otherwise as cavalry
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC/TC 0-2
Greek ally Generals As light horse if Aitolian, otherwise as cavalry TC 0-3
Early German
Generals As cavalry
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC/TC 0-2
German ally generals As cavalry FC/TC 0-2
Anglo-Irish
Justiciar ??“
C-in-C As Justiciar??™s men-at-arms IC/FC/TC 0-1
Anglo-Irish generals As Anglo-Irish lances or spears
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC 0-1
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
Should all or some of the Anglo-Irish SGs be AGs? (Optionally or compulsorily)
Medieval Irish
Should all or some of the SGs be AGs? (Optionally or compulsorily)
Ordonnance Burgundian
C-in-C: FC/TC
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
Ancient Spanish
Generals As large shield cavalry
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC/TC 0-2
Spanish ally generals As large shield cavalry FC/TC 0-2
Pyrrhic
C-in-C: IC
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
Pontic
C-in-C: FC/TC
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
Gallic
Generals As chariots or cavalry C-in-C: IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC/TC 0-2
Gallic ally generals As chariots or cavalry FC/TC 0-2
Komnenan Byzantine
Generals As Byzantine cavalry
C-in-C: IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
As Varangian guard FC/TC 0-1
Norman general As Latinikon FC/TC 0-1
Unless listed below, to:
C-in-C: IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
Exceptions
Classical Greek
Generals As cavalry or hoplites
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC
SGs: TC 0-2
Greek ally Generals As cavalry or hoplites TC 0-3
Harsh? Probably realistic, but what other armies should also be so affected?
At least it won??™t knobble them too much as having all SGs as TC is currently favoured as a cost-effective configuriation. (Unless we change the generals rules)
Classical Indian
Generals As elephants, chariots or cavalry.
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC/TC 0-2
Indian ally generals As elephants, chariots or cavalry. FC/TC 0-3
Hard to justify a compulsory AG e.g. in Mauryan empire
Alexandrian Macedonian
List notes:
If the C-in-C is Alexander he must be an IC.
Hellenistic Greek
Generals As light horse if Aitolian, otherwise as cavalry
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC/TC 0-2
Greek ally Generals As light horse if Aitolian, otherwise as cavalry TC 0-3
Early German
Generals As cavalry
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC/TC 0-2
German ally generals As cavalry FC/TC 0-2
Anglo-Irish
Justiciar ??“
C-in-C As Justiciar??™s men-at-arms IC/FC/TC 0-1
Anglo-Irish generals As Anglo-Irish lances or spears
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC 0-1
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
Should all or some of the Anglo-Irish SGs be AGs? (Optionally or compulsorily)
Medieval Irish
Should all or some of the SGs be AGs? (Optionally or compulsorily)
Ordonnance Burgundian
C-in-C: FC/TC
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
Ancient Spanish
Generals As large shield cavalry
C-in-C:
IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC/TC 0-2
Spanish ally generals As large shield cavalry FC/TC 0-2
Pyrrhic
C-in-C: IC
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
Pontic
C-in-C: FC/TC
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
Gallic
Generals As chariots or cavalry C-in-C: IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC/TC 0-2
Gallic ally generals As chariots or cavalry FC/TC 0-2
Komnenan Byzantine
Generals As Byzantine cavalry
C-in-C: IC/FC/TC
SGs: FC 0-2, TC 0-3
As Varangian guard FC/TC 0-1
Norman general As Latinikon FC/TC 0-1