Gunpowder Triumphant.
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 4:18 pm
Please tell me if we have this wrong>>>
To try out the rules we did this scenario Two fresh average pike and shot units from the English Civil War face eachother at 5mu.We assumed the units can't fire salvo as it is not mentioned in the army lists. Stationary Parliament unit fires at the advancing Royalist. long range so 1/2 stands fire. Cant cause a Cohesion test as it needs three hits from two shot. There is a 50% change of each shot hitting (45or 6 on a D6) so averge 1 hit. The Royalist has on average therefore a 5 out of 6 chance (? about 88% ?) of passing his deathrole and strolling towards he waiting Parliamentarians untroubled. Now for the next round. We assume the Royalist missed and Parliament now have for shots again at 50% per dice giving an average of 2 hits and causing a cohesion test. The Royalist has an officer in command range cancelling out the POA for taking the 1HP3B so has a slightly better than 50% chance of getting away with it. He also has a 66% chance of passing his Deathroll too. Even if he fails his Cohesion Test this still wont effect his units performance in the Impact Phase as he would not be severley disordered.
Believe me we tried it. TEN TIMES! Of the SIXTY Royalist stand only four were "killed". Two of the ten units became disrupted (all the kills were at close range btw).
So what does all this mean. Well basically if the attacking player has not very seriously offended the Death Roll God we cannot see a reason why the majority of units advancing straight into the teeth of their enemy in a frontal assult should not largely get there effectively unscathed. In a time where, as it says in the rules intro, the proportion of shot was steadily increasing, (presumably because it was increasingly effective,) this seems a little odd.
Please let me know where we are going this wrong
For Parliament and The Cause!
Rook
To try out the rules we did this scenario Two fresh average pike and shot units from the English Civil War face eachother at 5mu.We assumed the units can't fire salvo as it is not mentioned in the army lists. Stationary Parliament unit fires at the advancing Royalist. long range so 1/2 stands fire. Cant cause a Cohesion test as it needs three hits from two shot. There is a 50% change of each shot hitting (45or 6 on a D6) so averge 1 hit. The Royalist has on average therefore a 5 out of 6 chance (? about 88% ?) of passing his deathrole and strolling towards he waiting Parliamentarians untroubled. Now for the next round. We assume the Royalist missed and Parliament now have for shots again at 50% per dice giving an average of 2 hits and causing a cohesion test. The Royalist has an officer in command range cancelling out the POA for taking the 1HP3B so has a slightly better than 50% chance of getting away with it. He also has a 66% chance of passing his Deathroll too. Even if he fails his Cohesion Test this still wont effect his units performance in the Impact Phase as he would not be severley disordered.
Believe me we tried it. TEN TIMES! Of the SIXTY Royalist stand only four were "killed". Two of the ten units became disrupted (all the kills were at close range btw).
So what does all this mean. Well basically if the attacking player has not very seriously offended the Death Roll God we cannot see a reason why the majority of units advancing straight into the teeth of their enemy in a frontal assult should not largely get there effectively unscathed. In a time where, as it says in the rules intro, the proportion of shot was steadily increasing, (presumably because it was increasingly effective,) this seems a little odd.
Please let me know where we are going this wrong
For Parliament and The Cause!
Rook