Page 1 of 8
IWF 2011 - New Zealand
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 7:21 pm
by dave_r
Is there not a stickied thingy for this tournament?
I have been to the website
http://www.iwf2011.org website and I admit it is probably me being thick - but where is the actual venue?
Where is everybody else staying? Seems to be a lot of choice out there!
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 7:32 pm
by timmy1
Dave, they are waiting for you to announce where you have booked... as you know 'Dave is Wrong' so might apply to hotels as much as rules...
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:18 pm
by hammy
Mich and I are booked into the Ibis.
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:41 pm
by dave_r
Is the Ibis the venue?
Tim is obviously just jealous.
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:44 pm
by hammy
dave_r wrote:Is the Ibis the venue?
No, the venue is a building near the harbour. The Ibis is one block away, at least that is what it says on the site under Wellington and Hospitality.
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 6:07 pm
by davidandlynda
And they've probably got a room as Lynda and I have now cancelled
David
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:48 am
by zoltan
Check out this website for the latest on the Worlds:
http://theiwf.wordpress.com/
Most of the army lists have now been submitted and checked (with a handful of laggards) and Runners and Rider lists are starting to be posted.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:35 am
by zoltan
DBR, DBM and FoG R&R now available here:
http://theiwf.wordpress.com/
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:47 am
by petedalby
Best of luck to the UK contingent!!
And to Dan!!
And to the guy using Ottomans!
Hope it goes well!
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:33 am
by philqw78
Looking at the field I fear a top 3 of Drummond, Evans and Ruddock. Will Shaun be able to take home advantage? Will Graham avoid too many inconclusive games? Will Ruddock ever be move beyond the bridesmaid status?
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:36 am
by petedalby
Looking at the field I fear a top 3 of Drummond, Evans and Ruddock.
You do Mr Hamilton a dis-service surely?
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:44 am
by philqw78
petedalby wrote:Looking at the field I fear a top 3 of Drummond, Evans and Ruddock.
You do Mr Hamilton a dis-service surely?
I was talking about who was going to be in the top 3 Pete, not top 33.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:49 am
by petedalby
I was talking about who was going to be in the top 3 Pete, not top 33.
Very harsh! I think he'll do quite well.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:09 pm
by philqw78
petedalby wrote:I was talking about who was going to be in the top 3 Pete, not top 33.
Very harsh! I think he'll do quite well.
Well he won't finish 34th out of 34. Probably.
OK then, since I have no interest in this, other than ridiculing the failure of other MAWS members, my predictions for top 5 are:
1 Graham Evans
2 Shaun Drummond
3 Dave Ruddock
4 Mark Holland
5 Begrudgingly, Hammy
All depending upon when and if they meet each other.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:48 pm
by nikgaukroger
WIC 2011 Runners & Riders – the List Checker Comments
Having seen all the lists here are some entirely biased comments on the offerings.
Aaron Nicoll (NZ) Bosporan (Dominate) AD 300 – IMO there are some pitfalls in the Bosporan list, and this army has fallen into some of them but should still do OK.
Ross Dawe (AUS) Bosporan AD 160 – whilst not identical, has the same issues as above IMO.
Steve Hodgson (NZ) Alexandrian Macedonian BC 326 – useful army, but like a lot of the Makedonian style armies can suffer against horse-boy outfits.
Dan Hazelwood (USA) XiaXia AD 1207 – a much better list than his dodgy American Team Championship choice, should finish in the top 1/3 quite easily.
Ian Sharp (AUS) Later Seleucid BC 166-124 – solid, but will have the usual issues against horse-boy armies.
Michael Haycock (NZ) Three Kingdoms Korea (Shilla) – one I’m interested to see how it does, however, I fear it may not be good.
Dave Ruddock (UK) Bosporan BC 108 – good list and, much as it pains me, my tip for the top.
Steve Murton (UK) Catalan Company AD 1380 – one of those lists I’ve never yet seen a version of I like, however, in theory should do OK.
Shaun Drummond (NZ) Later Serbian AD 1390 – good list, good player, top 3 finish.
Mitchell Ortuondo (AUS) Pontic BC 90 – can be a real mixed bag of troop types, but also can deal with horse-boys better than many Hellenistics; however, I don’t like the list picked.
Aleksander Misic (AUS) Later Serbian AD 1345 – a direct army, but can’t help feeling there is a Meerkat connection here ...
Murray Evans (AUS) Arab Conquest AD 638 – a list I find can do well, but can be unable to finish people off at times.
Paul Rattray (AUS) Later Ottoman Turk AD 1450 – hard to go wrong with drawing up this list, but needs real skill to do well with; has the boy Rattray got the form?
Craig Byron (NZ) Post Latin Conquest Byzantine AD 1250 – not a bad list, could do well.
Mike Gray (AUS) Middle Assyrian BC 889 – not going to do well I’m afraid.
Andre Evers (NZ) Saka after BC 250 – will have trouble finishing off some opponents, otherwise solid choice.
Kerry Docherty (NZ) Santa Hermandad Nueva Castilian AD 1483 – a morally bankrupt army that needs a good player to drive it, otherwise will draw a lot.
Ian Doel (NZ) Carolingian Frankish AD 814 – the list is better than I thought it was at first glance, but has some weaknesses that need to be defended.
Gordon Pinchin (NZ) Principate Roman AD 265 – an army list with a plan, has Gordon the skill to carry it off?
Graham Evans (UK) Dominate Roman AD 390 – predictably dull choice from the current champion; whilst the army is starting to perform less well at home where players are getting used to it, I’d expect it to do well in this comp – top 3 finish.
Richard Stacey (NZ) Early Northern African Dynasties AD 827 – has the potential to surprise.
Gary Coughlan (AUS) Gallic (Iberian) BC 150 – sorry Gary, it looks like a victim to me.
Leigh Dunn (AUS) Later Sicilian AD 1236 – could surprise.
George Galloway (AUS) Viking AD 866 – good, solid Viking outfit, not my cup of tea at all.
James Hamilton (UK) Early Hungarian AD 1237 – good list that will only be held back if Hammy isn’t aggressive enough, top 5 finish.
Mark Holland (NZ) Later Serbian Empire AD 1399 – good list, should do well.
Peter Hood (NZ) Foederate Roman AD 450 – could do well if handled well, if not will be in the lower 1/3 of the table.
Glen Noonan AUS – nothing listed but will make no difference what he takes ...
Josh Gardner (NZ) Aztecs AD 1376 – if Josh has the skill it can do well, if not ...
Richard Woolford (NZ) Ancient British BC 54 – an army that can do well if used unconventionally, not quite sure this is set up to do that but has potential.
Brett Kvisle (AUS) Later Macedonian BC 205 – solid army but will have trouble with horse-boy armies.
Richard Stubbs (AUS) Medieval Irish AD 1415 – different, alas I think it has serious flaws.
Anthony Winter (AUS) Latin Greek AD 1310 – so, so list.
Daryl Jones (NZ) Ilkhanid Mongol AD 1260-1308 – IMO an army list that promises more than it delivers, and I find this version to be just that.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:03 pm
by hazelbark
Note his serious predictions here. Does Nik has a crystal ball or a sno-globe?
nikgaukroger wrote:WIC 2011 Runners & Riders – the List Checker Comments
Dave Ruddock (UK) Bosporan BC 108 – my tip for the top.
Dan Hazelwood (USA) XiaXia AD 1207 – should finish in the top 1/3
Graham Evans (UK) Dominate Roman AD 390 – top 3 finish.
James Hamilton (UK) Early Hungarian AD 1237 – top 5 finish.
So according to Nik, only 1 non-GB player will be in top 3 and two in top 5. Given the utter disaster of the redcoats at Lisbon, a lot is riding on this outcome. A failure to hold these predictions surely must require the BHGS banning these players from using these armies every again.

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:17 pm
by philqw78
But he reckons you will come about 11th Dan
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:18 pm
by nikgaukroger
philqw78 wrote:But he reckons you will come about 11th Dan
Dan has to over-achieve once in his life

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:19 pm
by hazelbark
Why? Its much more reliable to underachieve.
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:22 pm
by dave_r
hazelbark wrote:Why? Its much more reliable to underachieve.
Dan, you are very reliable
